Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6398345" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>The only agreement necessary is that the advocate feels that this is the best representation of what they're advocating for. Since feelings aren't wrong, we can all agree that this is what the advocate thinks is best about the setting, and judge it based on that. That's still not going to be everyone's cup of tea (it'll still be irreverent in the face of majesty, forex), but at least we'll be judging it on qualities it actually has even when it is ideal and not worry about quibbling about the preconceived notions baked into us by our varied experiences. It might be some weird unattainable platonic ideal, or not well reflected in the source material, or whatever, but at least we'll be talking about an experience we can agree on as a valid and representative experience. </p><p></p><p>Anything less than that is essentially as strawman. "Oh, there was this bad experience someone had once, so I suppose the whole thing must be invalid since it can't prevent that." </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Those things aren't really opposed. Just because the cliffhanger at the end of <em>The Thing</em> is unresolved doesn't mean the setting of that movie doesn't go through some great change, including "everyone dies."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's thousands of drow in FR, but that doesn't mean that Drizz't's rebellion isn't a big change in the setting. FR has lots of cities, and some of them were left untouched by the Spellplague, and that doesn't indicate that the Spellplague wasn't real change. Just because Taladas never saw the Dragonarmies doesn't mean the War of the Lance was an illusion of change. So the Dragon might still rampage over the face of Athas, but the victory in Tyr was no real change? </p><p></p><p>Planes shifting, factions warring, and demon lords ascending are at LEAST as significant as that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Oh, you succeeded in a revolution in Tyr? A shame the world is still a desert."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Oh, you overthrew the Dragonarmies? But what about that supplement that was hypothetical at one point where maybe they were coming back?"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The changes didn't change the things you wanted to be changed, but they still happened and were significant. We don't need to burn the setting to the ground just to achieve some significant change (and FW, given the fan's reaction, certainly was a bit like burning the setting to the ground). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't know how you can look at, I dunno, the Spellplague, and say "there's a big change!" and then look at FW and dismiss it as not real change. Your criteria are opaque if they're not arbitrary. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So this is the first time you've mentioned anything about dramatic weight. "Dramatic weight" and "preservation of the setting's status quo" are two different (though potentially related) topics. I can probably go on for pages about either. In terms of dramatic weight, I dunno, if everything you've ever believed to be true about the universe was suddenly challenged, that would be pretty dramatic, and that's basically the center conflict in any PS campaign, so I don't know why you'd pretend it wasn't there. </p><p></p><p>But again, I'm just seeing a blanket dimissal of counterpoints here, which leads me to believe that you're not so much interested in a real conversation, as you are in saying that anyone who likes PS is embracing or ignoring this Bad Thing about it that you've decided it has. You don't seem to want to entertain the idea that PS might not have this Bad Thing inherently, that your reason for not liking it might just be based on your limited experience and not objective reality, that maybe the people who have dang good fun in PS aren't delusional or ignorant about it. And it's kind of useless to hold a conversation with someone who isn't going to change their mind. So, you know, sorry you don't want any of my bacon, but I get that you don't, and that you think I'm a fool for enjoying it, but that's your bag. If you want to think I'm a fool, I can't stop you. Most I can do is enjoy this bacon. </p><p></p><p>mmmmm, bacon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 6398345, member: 2067"] The only agreement necessary is that the advocate feels that this is the best representation of what they're advocating for. Since feelings aren't wrong, we can all agree that this is what the advocate thinks is best about the setting, and judge it based on that. That's still not going to be everyone's cup of tea (it'll still be irreverent in the face of majesty, forex), but at least we'll be judging it on qualities it actually has even when it is ideal and not worry about quibbling about the preconceived notions baked into us by our varied experiences. It might be some weird unattainable platonic ideal, or not well reflected in the source material, or whatever, but at least we'll be talking about an experience we can agree on as a valid and representative experience. Anything less than that is essentially as strawman. "Oh, there was this bad experience someone had once, so I suppose the whole thing must be invalid since it can't prevent that." Those things aren't really opposed. Just because the cliffhanger at the end of [I]The Thing[/I] is unresolved doesn't mean the setting of that movie doesn't go through some great change, including "everyone dies." There's thousands of drow in FR, but that doesn't mean that Drizz't's rebellion isn't a big change in the setting. FR has lots of cities, and some of them were left untouched by the Spellplague, and that doesn't indicate that the Spellplague wasn't real change. Just because Taladas never saw the Dragonarmies doesn't mean the War of the Lance was an illusion of change. So the Dragon might still rampage over the face of Athas, but the victory in Tyr was no real change? Planes shifting, factions warring, and demon lords ascending are at LEAST as significant as that. "Oh, you succeeded in a revolution in Tyr? A shame the world is still a desert." "Oh, you overthrew the Dragonarmies? But what about that supplement that was hypothetical at one point where maybe they were coming back?" The changes didn't change the things you wanted to be changed, but they still happened and were significant. We don't need to burn the setting to the ground just to achieve some significant change (and FW, given the fan's reaction, certainly was a bit like burning the setting to the ground). I don't know how you can look at, I dunno, the Spellplague, and say "there's a big change!" and then look at FW and dismiss it as not real change. Your criteria are opaque if they're not arbitrary. So this is the first time you've mentioned anything about dramatic weight. "Dramatic weight" and "preservation of the setting's status quo" are two different (though potentially related) topics. I can probably go on for pages about either. In terms of dramatic weight, I dunno, if everything you've ever believed to be true about the universe was suddenly challenged, that would be pretty dramatic, and that's basically the center conflict in any PS campaign, so I don't know why you'd pretend it wasn't there. But again, I'm just seeing a blanket dimissal of counterpoints here, which leads me to believe that you're not so much interested in a real conversation, as you are in saying that anyone who likes PS is embracing or ignoring this Bad Thing about it that you've decided it has. You don't seem to want to entertain the idea that PS might not have this Bad Thing inherently, that your reason for not liking it might just be based on your limited experience and not objective reality, that maybe the people who have dang good fun in PS aren't delusional or ignorant about it. And it's kind of useless to hold a conversation with someone who isn't going to change their mind. So, you know, sorry you don't want any of my bacon, but I get that you don't, and that you think I'm a fool for enjoying it, but that's your bag. If you want to think I'm a fool, I can't stop you. Most I can do is enjoy this bacon. mmmmm, bacon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
Top