Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6398546" data-attributes="member: 48965">I think this is the problem right here... @<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=2067" target="_blank">Kamikaze Midget</a> has presented facts as rebuttals to your assertions about the nature of Planescape, instances of change in the setting, types and scope of dramatic weight, etc. and all of your counters have been about how you feel something is or your impressions of the setting as opposed to something tangible.   Show us examples where change has been purposefully rejected in Planescape to keep the status quo (instead we get a hypothetical sourcebook that never saw the light of day that might have put the factions, at least those that weren't outright destroyed, back in Sigil).  Give examples of what would be dramatically weighty enough instead if just saying nope to everything that is presented.  No one is asking you to be an automaton and nod your head but is sticking your fingers in your ears and going nuh-uh without supporting your own argument any better (I'd actually argue in this instance it is worse)?   No, you're being "maligned" because you are making general and objectively presented statements about a particular thing but haven't provided any evidence to support your assertion and when presented with evidence that contradicts your assertions have waved it off as... "Well that's how I feel the setting is.."  Your "reasons" for disliking it appear fabricated and disingenuous because you've presented nothing concrete to support them.</blockquote>

Verification