Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6400819" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>Note, just to be absolutely clear, I'm talking about The Planes and not Planescape. I honestly don't know enough about Planescape to really comment.</p><p></p><p>And, it's mostly the fan base I'm irritated with. I thought that would have been pretty clear all the way along. it's the fan base that cares about canon after all. </p><p></p><p>If the planes (no caps) was a resource, then there would be no problems with changes. You can have fifteen different kinds of trolls from ice trolls to giant two headed trolls and no one cares. You can have different kinds of pretty much everything, mixing and matching features and changing baseline creatures all the way along, and by and large, it's fine. Like I said, a 1e kobold and a 5e kobold are completely not the same creature. About the only commonality is that they are both size small. Orcs have changed dramatically over the years. Heck, giants and dragons have both morphed into completely unrecognisable forms - dragons in 1e most of the time couldn't even cast spells and were not particularly large creatures - dragons in 3e and 4e are massive engines of destruction. Giants got a massive boost between editions. On and on and on. And these changes were judged based on the merits of the change. It makes sense for a game called Dungeons and Dragons to make dragons the biggest baddie around.</p><p></p><p>But The Planes are a setting so, they can never really change very much. Any change is automatically judged based on established canon rather than the merits of the change itself. Which is fine. They have become a setting and I should view them the same way I view all published settings - largely not worth my time a and largely something to ignore. I don't generally run published settings. In 30 years, the only published setting I've run is Scarred Lands. I'll play in published settings, but, I won't run them, nor will I buy anything related to them. Outside of my Scarred Lands collection, the last published setting book I bought was the 2e Faiths and Avatars.</p><p></p><p>Well, sorry, that's a bit of a lie since I forgot I own the Fiendish Codex II, but that came in a box with a bunch of other books, so, I don't really count it and I certainly never used it in any game I ran. Faiths and Avatars at least some some use.</p><p></p><p>I like modules, but I really don't do settings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6400819, member: 22779"] Note, just to be absolutely clear, I'm talking about The Planes and not Planescape. I honestly don't know enough about Planescape to really comment. And, it's mostly the fan base I'm irritated with. I thought that would have been pretty clear all the way along. it's the fan base that cares about canon after all. If the planes (no caps) was a resource, then there would be no problems with changes. You can have fifteen different kinds of trolls from ice trolls to giant two headed trolls and no one cares. You can have different kinds of pretty much everything, mixing and matching features and changing baseline creatures all the way along, and by and large, it's fine. Like I said, a 1e kobold and a 5e kobold are completely not the same creature. About the only commonality is that they are both size small. Orcs have changed dramatically over the years. Heck, giants and dragons have both morphed into completely unrecognisable forms - dragons in 1e most of the time couldn't even cast spells and were not particularly large creatures - dragons in 3e and 4e are massive engines of destruction. Giants got a massive boost between editions. On and on and on. And these changes were judged based on the merits of the change. It makes sense for a game called Dungeons and Dragons to make dragons the biggest baddie around. But The Planes are a setting so, they can never really change very much. Any change is automatically judged based on established canon rather than the merits of the change itself. Which is fine. They have become a setting and I should view them the same way I view all published settings - largely not worth my time a and largely something to ignore. I don't generally run published settings. In 30 years, the only published setting I've run is Scarred Lands. I'll play in published settings, but, I won't run them, nor will I buy anything related to them. Outside of my Scarred Lands collection, the last published setting book I bought was the 2e Faiths and Avatars. Well, sorry, that's a bit of a lie since I forgot I own the Fiendish Codex II, but that came in a box with a bunch of other books, so, I don't really count it and I certainly never used it in any game I ran. Faiths and Avatars at least some some use. I like modules, but I really don't do settings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
Top