Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6401260" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>Ok, you were originally talking about Planescape, but even with the planes WotC changed them pretty drastically with 4e and there have been more minor changes throughout various editions... so it's hard for me to understand where you are coming from. I feel like you still aren't saying exactly what you want... Do you want an inconsistent planar structure across all sourcebooks, adventures and campaign settings? Because that would be... confusing to say the least. Do you want a mutlitude of options every time something planar is in a sourcebook, adventure or campaign setting? Because then we drive up the word count... If you want examples and material to construct your own planar setting... well I know at least 3.x and 4e offered this in their planar books... so what exactly is the complaint?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well you do keep saying WotC doesn't make planar changes, of course it seems like as a business they should be listening the the majority(?) of their fanbase and what they want. That's just smart business...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ok, so you're speaking to planar resources across editions. I would argue that the planes have changed, though mostly in minor and gradual ways across editions with the most drastic exceptions being in BECMI and 4e (not really sure about OD&D as I don't know what the planar structure was for it). The thing is WotC as a business needs to cater to what the majority of their fanbase wants. You talk about judging things on their own merit, but I disagree things are always judged on what came before and planar structure is no different. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree here... I think most people judge the planes just like they judge anything else in a game with as much history (and editions) as D&D... that's to say the "do I like it better test". IMO, that is judging it on it's own merits and you seem to be mad that the majority are finding the drastic changes lacking. Not sure how to address this but I am glad the planes have moved more into sync with what I enjoy... There was a whole previous edition for those who wanted drastic changes... Now it's changed again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 6401260, member: 48965"] Ok, you were originally talking about Planescape, but even with the planes WotC changed them pretty drastically with 4e and there have been more minor changes throughout various editions... so it's hard for me to understand where you are coming from. I feel like you still aren't saying exactly what you want... Do you want an inconsistent planar structure across all sourcebooks, adventures and campaign settings? Because that would be... confusing to say the least. Do you want a mutlitude of options every time something planar is in a sourcebook, adventure or campaign setting? Because then we drive up the word count... If you want examples and material to construct your own planar setting... well I know at least 3.x and 4e offered this in their planar books... so what exactly is the complaint? Well you do keep saying WotC doesn't make planar changes, of course it seems like as a business they should be listening the the majority(?) of their fanbase and what they want. That's just smart business... Ok, so you're speaking to planar resources across editions. I would argue that the planes have changed, though mostly in minor and gradual ways across editions with the most drastic exceptions being in BECMI and 4e (not really sure about OD&D as I don't know what the planar structure was for it). The thing is WotC as a business needs to cater to what the majority of their fanbase wants. You talk about judging things on their own merit, but I disagree things are always judged on what came before and planar structure is no different. I disagree here... I think most people judge the planes just like they judge anything else in a game with as much history (and editions) as D&D... that's to say the "do I like it better test". IMO, that is judging it on it's own merits and you seem to be mad that the majority are finding the drastic changes lacking. Not sure how to address this but I am glad the planes have moved more into sync with what I enjoy... There was a whole previous edition for those who wanted drastic changes... Now it's changed again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
Top