Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6402540" data-attributes="member: 48965">Where does it say they are a slave race? The connection to dragons started in 3.5... though I honestly don't think it was core now that we're making that distinction.  But really out of all the things I listed you found a single thing that wasn't consistent with kobolds as they've always been?  Seriously... this is the great sweeping changes monsters go through as opposed to the smaller increments of the planes and planar monsters?  Nothing has been invalidated, the mythos of the kobold has stayed consistent with how i'ts been presented in nearly all editions of D&D (as opposed to the Eladrin and Tieflings of 4e) and instead it's lore has been added to... as opposed to invalidated as you seem to want done to the planes and planar creatures...  I'd also like to point out that the Urd wings being a gift from Tiamat is not presented as truth, but as how kobolds view it... again a pretty minor change that invalidates nothing from previous editions and can easily be ignored if necessary.Short, reptilian guy with horns... yeah my 5e Kobold is the same thing...Edit: The only difference is yours is a picture of a rogue kobold while mine is a picture of a savage barbarian kobold... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></blockquote>