Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6404250" data-attributes="member: 48965">Yes radically flawed in that he is aligned with chaos... which has both good and evil aspects in it, this absolute CG person only exemplifies the good aspects of chaos... Yet this still falls out of line with the LG person because he exemplifies the good aspects of law... both are good and I don't see why (especially if good is defined) why this can't be recognized and yet the methods and finer points of the results be disagreed upon? I am talking about a Moorcokian-esque weird-fantasy cosmology (which again IMO, Planescape does well)... not a real world cosmology in my game.  The fact that there are no examples of this cosmology in the real world (though quite a few in literature of the sword and sorcery type), is not IMO a valid argument since the game is full of things that there are no examples of in the real world.   As many times as I've seen you rally against the versimilitude argument in 4e discussions I find it quite surprising that this is essentially what your argument against alignment boils down to... it's not real enough??</blockquote>