Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6414676" data-attributes="member: 2067">Yeah, I'm on your page with that. Certainly as I've played it and as I envision it at its most iconic, the Great Wheel is only one interpretation of how the planes might look. The rules I don't use that might work against that view might include the "Weapons lose plusses as they go away from their home plane," and I think there was a similar rule for clerics casting spells. I ignored a broad swath of the modifications of the planes on magic, and in 3e, I ignored the "alignment" traits of the planes. Were I to mastermind a re-launch, I would take a "pre-faction-war" starting point (and perhaps describe a faction war as one thing a DM might do with the setting). I'm not sure a "reality quake" is necessary, if there's no way to tell what the "shape" of the planes is, so that someone could propose the World Axis and someone could propose the Great Wheel and someone could propose the Orrey and it would all be possibly true. I'd prefer the PC's to make a reality quake. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> But that does sound delightful!</blockquote>