Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6418097" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>I don't think that's inaccurate, but I think we differ on whether or not this is <em>actually a problem</em>. "Good" just describes one kind of belief. "Evil" describes another. PS presents a universe where neither can be said to be more true or worthy than the other. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the more natural response, in PS, if the demon sees fit to give an honest reply, is "Because it is what we all ought to be doing." In fact, that's probably what a lot of PS characters of any stripe reply when asked why they did something. That's part of living according to your beliefs -- you behave as you think people ought to behave. CE, as a foundation for a coherent belief system, might indicate that a pursuit of personal pleasure, even at the expense of others, is how to live one's life truthfully and honestly. To do otherwise would be to deny that hedonic pleasure, and for no worthy purpose. The demon has a <em>telos</em>, it knows exactly what its life is for, its own pleasure, and its purpose is greater than any other purpose, at least in its mind. The fact that this is called "Chaotic Evil" is only labeling (which is part of why PS isn't inextricable from the concept of alignment). The archon has its own <em>telos</em>, it knows exactly what its life is for, to preserve the contented and free lives of as many beings as it is able to. This is the greatest purpose, according to that archon. The fact that this is called "Lawful Good" doesn't make the archon's belief any more true than the demon. The archon's purpose has virtues, but is flawed. The demon's purpose is ruthless, but not without its appeals. A PC could reasonably hold and fight for either of those beliefs. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure. What's in question in PS is whether or not "engaging with the necessary conditions of meaningful social life" is actually any sort of worthy goal for existence. A demon might argue that, of course, it's not -- if the purpose of existence is to cultivate and engage in hedonic pleasure, spending time refraining from doing whatever you feel like at the moment is standing in the way of that goal, and so social life is basically a waste of time unless one is getting personal delight from it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Player Characters. By facing game challenges, living according to their belief and transforming the multiverse, they prioritize their own "wants" over that of competing systems. In fact, this describes PS <em>quite</em> well: a state of conflict that can be resolved in play if the players succeed. By extension, their antagonists as well. </p><p></p><p>This is also the purpose behind the factions: competing systems of belief that set up inherent conflicts in the setting that the PC's can resolve to the favor of whatever they throw their lot in with. </p><p></p><p>If the PC's throw their lot in with the demons (or a faction that espouses a similar philosophy -- perhaps certain stripes of Sensate, for instance!), you can be quite assured that, if they are successful, NPC's that they've influenced across the multiverse will be acting according to their personal wants now, and, indeed, the very heavens may be torn asunder, or the destruction of the multiverse well and truly started. This goal may even be desirable: this was what the PC's always believed was going to happen anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 6418097, member: 2067"] I don't think that's inaccurate, but I think we differ on whether or not this is [I]actually a problem[/I]. "Good" just describes one kind of belief. "Evil" describes another. PS presents a universe where neither can be said to be more true or worthy than the other. I think the more natural response, in PS, if the demon sees fit to give an honest reply, is "Because it is what we all ought to be doing." In fact, that's probably what a lot of PS characters of any stripe reply when asked why they did something. That's part of living according to your beliefs -- you behave as you think people ought to behave. CE, as a foundation for a coherent belief system, might indicate that a pursuit of personal pleasure, even at the expense of others, is how to live one's life truthfully and honestly. To do otherwise would be to deny that hedonic pleasure, and for no worthy purpose. The demon has a [I]telos[/I], it knows exactly what its life is for, its own pleasure, and its purpose is greater than any other purpose, at least in its mind. The fact that this is called "Chaotic Evil" is only labeling (which is part of why PS isn't inextricable from the concept of alignment). The archon has its own [I]telos[/I], it knows exactly what its life is for, to preserve the contented and free lives of as many beings as it is able to. This is the greatest purpose, according to that archon. The fact that this is called "Lawful Good" doesn't make the archon's belief any more true than the demon. The archon's purpose has virtues, but is flawed. The demon's purpose is ruthless, but not without its appeals. A PC could reasonably hold and fight for either of those beliefs. Sure. What's in question in PS is whether or not "engaging with the necessary conditions of meaningful social life" is actually any sort of worthy goal for existence. A demon might argue that, of course, it's not -- if the purpose of existence is to cultivate and engage in hedonic pleasure, spending time refraining from doing whatever you feel like at the moment is standing in the way of that goal, and so social life is basically a waste of time unless one is getting personal delight from it. Player Characters. By facing game challenges, living according to their belief and transforming the multiverse, they prioritize their own "wants" over that of competing systems. In fact, this describes PS [I]quite[/I] well: a state of conflict that can be resolved in play if the players succeed. By extension, their antagonists as well. This is also the purpose behind the factions: competing systems of belief that set up inherent conflicts in the setting that the PC's can resolve to the favor of whatever they throw their lot in with. If the PC's throw their lot in with the demons (or a faction that espouses a similar philosophy -- perhaps certain stripes of Sensate, for instance!), you can be quite assured that, if they are successful, NPC's that they've influenced across the multiverse will be acting according to their personal wants now, and, indeed, the very heavens may be torn asunder, or the destruction of the multiverse well and truly started. This goal may even be desirable: this was what the PC's always believed was going to happen anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
Top