hunter1828
Butte Hole Surfer
I moved this here so that I don't continue to disrupt a good thread on cross-gender roleplaying...
And again I mention that I know female archers who say that an everyday, normal sports bra is the only thing needed and the idea of self-mutilation, a la the amazons, would be, in their minds, ludicrous.
But the fact is, there is no actual evidence of an amazonian society that removed their breasts. Circumcision actually does happen, and frequently at that. And it has nothing to do with any sort of physical exertion or activity, such as archery. You have compared apples and oranges.
You are welcome to your interpretation of the myth. I interpret it differently.
Actually, I am an historian. It's how I make my living.
Having known women that have had to have a breast (or both) removed and knowing the emotional trauma they went through with that (outside and seperate from the trauma of the disease itself), I get uncomfortable thinking a female (mythological or historical) would voluntarily do that to themselves.
More power to you, your character and the women you tell about your character. The female gamers I know usually give someone a "Are-you-nuts?" look when the classical, mythological amazon is suggested to them as a character.
Kahuna Burger said:
Merely the notice that since I have heard women who've practiced archery say that some sort of binding or other would be needed, one guys random assertion was not useful. but you can claim I brought sexism into it if you really feel like it...
And again I mention that I know female archers who say that an everyday, normal sports bra is the only thing needed and the idea of self-mutilation, a la the amazons, would be, in their minds, ludicrous.
or not. I find nothing at all sexist in the idea (well, its only about women, so lets say I find nothing anti woman about it). As a part of the myth it is no worse an idea than that of circumcision - a ritual removal to show membership in a group which may or may not have a benefit.
But the fact is, there is no actual evidence of an amazonian society that removed their breasts. Circumcision actually does happen, and frequently at that. And it has nothing to do with any sort of physical exertion or activity, such as archery. You have compared apples and oranges.
I found the playing of a woman so unconcerned with her ability to lactate, or perception of her within a civilized view of what women is to be quite a wonderful expereince. I have examined the myth, and the mythos which has grown around it, and no, it doesn't even hint of the amazon being less than a woman, or bestial or any other bunk.
You are welcome to your interpretation of the myth. I interpret it differently.
For some reason, this part of a mythos turns otherwise sane fantasy fans into quasi historical scholars
Actually, I am an historian. It's how I make my living.
and makes men weirdly uncomfortable.
Having known women that have had to have a breast (or both) removed and knowing the emotional trauma they went through with that (outside and seperate from the trauma of the disease itself), I get uncomfortable thinking a female (mythological or historical) would voluntarily do that to themselves.
Its interesting. That reaction may well have some sexual connotations. But if the myth itself is a sexist attack on warrior women, it seems to have somehow eluded all the women I have ever told about my character or plans for a con costume. And the buyers of a very popular feminist poster which plays on the amazon mythos.
Kahuna burger [/B]
More power to you, your character and the women you tell about your character. The female gamers I know usually give someone a "Are-you-nuts?" look when the classical, mythological amazon is suggested to them as a character.