Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Myth of the Necessity of Magic Items
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darrell" data-source="post: 3384212" data-attributes="member: 680"><p>No, what I'm saying is that it isn't necessary to have a rules-driven 'reason' for the type of character you want to play. As in:</p><p></p><p>A: "What reason would you have to play a fighter when you can gain spells by taking a few levels of sorcerer?"</p><p></p><p>B: "Because I don't want to cast spells. I want to be a fighter with high STR and low INT. My character concept is a big, tough, stupid guy with a big, tough, stupid sword."</p><p></p><p>A: "But then the other characters will outclass you. They'll be able to do things beyond your abilities, especially at higher levels."</p><p></p><p>B: "Don't care. Big, tough, stupid guy; big, tough, stupid sword...period."</p><p></p><p>I simply don't think every character has to be 'balanced.' Real people aren't balanced. There is a popular myth that says, in effect, 'maybe Person X can do Talent Y better than I can, but I can do Talent Z better than he can, so we're balanced out.' This is, quite frankly, a load of rubbish. The truth is, there are people out there who can do Talents A through double-Q better than you can, and there will be nothing whatsoever you can do about it. I think it's far more important that you play a character you personally find interesting than that that character be 'balanced' with other characters.</p><p></p><p>The player in my campaign who plays the halfling bard/wizard, for example, wanted to play a beautiful, charismatic, magically-talented character who also happened to be physically weak and very gullible. She chose to be a halfling because they were physically the smallest race. (For all I know, she may be working out some issues there, because the lady in question is nearly six feet tall and built like a brick...well, you get the idea...but, I digress.)</p><p></p><p>If every other character were a spellcaster, she would still have played the character she's playing, because that was what she <em>wanted</em> to play. I would much rather have that character in my game than a fighter/rogue/wizard with carefully balanced feat and skill selections and maxed-out attack options who's been carefully plotted out to take advantage of every conceivable situation. There is very little difference between a character like that and a character in a video game, and players who want to play such a game are better off finding a different group to play with. </p><p></p><p>Building a character simply for a 'rules-bound' reason is, IMO, boring and pointless. Now if your character concept is, basically, Aragorn from LotR, then I expect a certain amount of building up of stats, bonuses, feats, etc., etc.--but don't expect everyone else to want to charge into battle every two minutes to right some wrong or destroy some silly ring just because you say so. That halfling up on the stage is trying to build influence with the leaders of the local thieves' guild, and the dwarf in the corner is looking for his family's ancient stronghold in the nearby mountains.</p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Darrell</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darrell, post: 3384212, member: 680"] No, what I'm saying is that it isn't necessary to have a rules-driven 'reason' for the type of character you want to play. As in: A: "What reason would you have to play a fighter when you can gain spells by taking a few levels of sorcerer?" B: "Because I don't want to cast spells. I want to be a fighter with high STR and low INT. My character concept is a big, tough, stupid guy with a big, tough, stupid sword." A: "But then the other characters will outclass you. They'll be able to do things beyond your abilities, especially at higher levels." B: "Don't care. Big, tough, stupid guy; big, tough, stupid sword...period." I simply don't think every character has to be 'balanced.' Real people aren't balanced. There is a popular myth that says, in effect, 'maybe Person X can do Talent Y better than I can, but I can do Talent Z better than he can, so we're balanced out.' This is, quite frankly, a load of rubbish. The truth is, there are people out there who can do Talents A through double-Q better than you can, and there will be nothing whatsoever you can do about it. I think it's far more important that you play a character you personally find interesting than that that character be 'balanced' with other characters. The player in my campaign who plays the halfling bard/wizard, for example, wanted to play a beautiful, charismatic, magically-talented character who also happened to be physically weak and very gullible. She chose to be a halfling because they were physically the smallest race. (For all I know, she may be working out some issues there, because the lady in question is nearly six feet tall and built like a brick...well, you get the idea...but, I digress.) If every other character were a spellcaster, she would still have played the character she's playing, because that was what she [I]wanted[/I] to play. I would much rather have that character in my game than a fighter/rogue/wizard with carefully balanced feat and skill selections and maxed-out attack options who's been carefully plotted out to take advantage of every conceivable situation. There is very little difference between a character like that and a character in a video game, and players who want to play such a game are better off finding a different group to play with. Building a character simply for a 'rules-bound' reason is, IMO, boring and pointless. Now if your character concept is, basically, Aragorn from LotR, then I expect a certain amount of building up of stats, bonuses, feats, etc., etc.--but don't expect everyone else to want to charge into battle every two minutes to right some wrong or destroy some silly ring just because you say so. That halfling up on the stage is trying to build influence with the leaders of the local thieves' guild, and the dwarf in the corner is looking for his family's ancient stronghold in the nearby mountains. Regards, Darrell [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Myth of the Necessity of Magic Items
Top