Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Teataine" data-source="post: 5776399" data-attributes="member: 6678036">As far as I'm concerned, that would mean they would totally lose me as a customer...Space for tinkering and change is not the same as shoddy, broken design.Also: in regards to "warlords being in the core or not"...the whole argument strikes me as incredibly inane. So if a class is in the first book they publish then it's a terrible game and people will hate it and if you release it as an option in a second (or third, or fourth) book, it's suddenly fine. Newsflash: classes in the core are optional, too. How does the fact that a class is released in the first or third book in the line impact the quality or likeability of a game in any way. This is why edition wars are so darn absurd most of the time. People latch on the silliest details. Like gnome hair. I don't like the 4E art direction either (and am not a 4E player in the first place), but who cares what kind of hair gnomes have in the books. They can have any kind of hair you like, it's not like it impacts gameplay./rant</blockquote>