Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
The New Monster Math, Explained and Expanded
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="(Psi)SeveredHead" data-source="post: 5816004" data-attributes="member: 1165"><p>Alright.</p><p></p><p>I guess I'm saying they seem a little "boring". They just have combat advantage going for them. They'll ambush with their Stealth skill, but then every round, they will (slowly) try to flank enemies to get combat advantage. That's all they do. IMO, they need something to be more interesting.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One thing you could try is making Tactical Strike a trait, like this:</p><p></p><p>Tactical Strike (martial): The rogue has combat advantage against any enemy that is adjacent to at least one of the rogue's allies.</p><p></p><p>As I like doing, it's a simpler version of a PC power. (The E-thief has the same ability as an at-will move action, which also prevents the rogue from provoking opportunity attacks if it moves from a square adjacent to an ally.)</p><p></p><p>The dwarves now work better as a team. They don't need to try to tumble around and flank, it's just that any PC facing two of them will be in a world of pain. The defenders and controllers will have to work extra hard to guard vulnerable PCs and split up the attackers.</p><p></p><p>(I believe this trait would also make shuriken nasty. If a rogue is next to a PC, a rogue 10 squares away can still hit that PC with their shuriken, gaining +2 to hit and +2d6 damage.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The funny thing is, that would work, but IMO that's not flavorful. (Brutes work well with Slayers, who don't have to work as hard for extra damage, but don't get the benefits of combat advantage whenever they feel like.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="(Psi)SeveredHead, post: 5816004, member: 1165"] Alright. I guess I'm saying they seem a little "boring". They just have combat advantage going for them. They'll ambush with their Stealth skill, but then every round, they will (slowly) try to flank enemies to get combat advantage. That's all they do. IMO, they need something to be more interesting. One thing you could try is making Tactical Strike a trait, like this: Tactical Strike (martial): The rogue has combat advantage against any enemy that is adjacent to at least one of the rogue's allies. As I like doing, it's a simpler version of a PC power. (The E-thief has the same ability as an at-will move action, which also prevents the rogue from provoking opportunity attacks if it moves from a square adjacent to an ally.) The dwarves now work better as a team. They don't need to try to tumble around and flank, it's just that any PC facing two of them will be in a world of pain. The defenders and controllers will have to work extra hard to guard vulnerable PCs and split up the attackers. (I believe this trait would also make shuriken nasty. If a rogue is next to a PC, a rogue 10 squares away can still hit that PC with their shuriken, gaining +2 to hit and +2d6 damage.) The funny thing is, that would work, but IMO that's not flavorful. (Brutes work well with Slayers, who don't have to work as hard for extra damage, but don't get the benefits of combat advantage whenever they feel like.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
The New Monster Math, Explained and Expanded
Top