Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="muffin_of_chaos" data-source="post: 4198336" data-attributes="member: 65007">Iit is obvious that if you want to multiclass 50/50 like you tried and failed to do in 3.x, you should get your DM to devise a base class that splits basic features and can select powers from both.  It won't be terribly balanced, but it'll be much better balanced than 3.x can be given flagrant disregard of balance in system mechanics, which should be good enough for you.  And it is a purer form of multiclassing 50/50 than 3.x in all cases.Not purer than 2.0, but also not suffering from the exp problem.If you don't want to multiclass 50/50, but just want to multiclass a bit, then it is dabbling in a class and the current official multiclassing rules work and you should be satisfied.If you want to go really nuts, you can just create a class and a bunch of class features/powers to go along with it.  But that form of homebrewed class isn't the same thing.I'll probably make a thread compiling together comboclasses for people who are dead-set on playing a real Warlock/Wizard or Rogue/Warlord.  And change 'em to adjust for balance as playtesting ensues.I do not advise anyone to comboclass.  But I don't discourage it either.  This thought exercise is merely to show that complaints against the 4E multiclassing system are unfounded.~the muffin</blockquote>