Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Obryn" data-source="post: 4954779" data-attributes="member: 11821">I don't really feel the need to expand on this list right now.  That slippery slope isn't inevitable, and it's not an automatic process - banning a few things now won't make me ban 20 tomorrow, and 100 the day after that.  Like I said before, I see this as cutting off the extreme tail so there's a wider variety of competing "bests."  There's no need to keep chopping, and if banning five items means the other thousands are bland ... I think we have bigger problems!Unless not-being-overpowered lacks fun, I can't see the problem.  There's more than one kind of fun.  We already pick some kinds of fun over others in the course of regular gaming, so this is an extension of that same decision.I don't really want that arms race.-O</blockquote>