Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The New Style
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3783489" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I'd be willing to defend Kim Possible as good, witty, story-telling. However, the male-female dynamic has been turned on its ear so often, that I think it hardly is worth noticing any more. It would be more surprising in the current culture to see the reverse dynamic, and the 'kick butt girl'/'slightly buffoonish guy' is so common that it can practically be considered the traditional gender role at this point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You say that like it was a bad thing. The connection between the shows and the toys allowed the producers to dump alot more money into the shows writing and animation than would have otherwised occurred. It turned kid's shows into money makers, and that brought with it quality. Granted, alot of suits never saw the connection between making a quality show and generating sales, and so you had alot of dreck along with the good. But at the high end, it was allowing the shows to hire writing and production talent that they never would have had otherwise and those writers were fighting for high quality production values and often got them. Licensing is good for children's show, and its not a coincidence that most of the few good children's cartoons since the 80's have been associated with licenses.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely. Silverhawks and The Go-Bots are among the worst cartoons ever. They were insulting even to the mentality of the eight year olds at the low end of thier target audience. Like I said, the licensing/toy connection produced an explosion in the demand for animation as everyone with any sort of line at all wanted to get in on the act, often on a shoe string budget with no clear idea of how the successful shows (Smurfs, GI Joe, etc.) had managed it.</p><p></p><p>As for the supposed pain you show, I wasn't personally a fan of Muppet Babies, but they definately 'hard thier charm' and could work on several levels, CBS Storybreak often rocked, Pole Position I mentioned, and most of the rest were aimed at an under 8 audience (for that matter so was Muppet Babies) and so are often painfully limited in thier stories and overly cutesy. But even some of those ('The Berenstein Bears') are classics of the type. I'd put that list up against anyone's Saturday morning line up now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3783489, member: 4937"] I'd be willing to defend Kim Possible as good, witty, story-telling. However, the male-female dynamic has been turned on its ear so often, that I think it hardly is worth noticing any more. It would be more surprising in the current culture to see the reverse dynamic, and the 'kick butt girl'/'slightly buffoonish guy' is so common that it can practically be considered the traditional gender role at this point. You say that like it was a bad thing. The connection between the shows and the toys allowed the producers to dump alot more money into the shows writing and animation than would have otherwised occurred. It turned kid's shows into money makers, and that brought with it quality. Granted, alot of suits never saw the connection between making a quality show and generating sales, and so you had alot of dreck along with the good. But at the high end, it was allowing the shows to hire writing and production talent that they never would have had otherwise and those writers were fighting for high quality production values and often got them. Licensing is good for children's show, and its not a coincidence that most of the few good children's cartoons since the 80's have been associated with licenses. Absolutely. Silverhawks and The Go-Bots are among the worst cartoons ever. They were insulting even to the mentality of the eight year olds at the low end of thier target audience. Like I said, the licensing/toy connection produced an explosion in the demand for animation as everyone with any sort of line at all wanted to get in on the act, often on a shoe string budget with no clear idea of how the successful shows (Smurfs, GI Joe, etc.) had managed it. As for the supposed pain you show, I wasn't personally a fan of Muppet Babies, but they definately 'hard thier charm' and could work on several levels, CBS Storybreak often rocked, Pole Position I mentioned, and most of the rest were aimed at an under 8 audience (for that matter so was Muppet Babies) and so are often painfully limited in thier stories and overly cutesy. But even some of those ('The Berenstein Bears') are classics of the type. I'd put that list up against anyone's Saturday morning line up now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The New Style
Top