Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9123034" data-attributes="member: 18">I mean, I'm not opposed to this, but by your own logic that's not necessarily true.The power of the conduit, the ability to use what is given, the ability to negotiate power, could very easily impact how strong Warlocks are. You could make a case for any of the three stats, or none - you could have just scale of PBx2 or something (yeah that'd be slightly OP, but you get my point). Hell, why stop at the mental stats? You could make a case for CON or STR. DEX is the only one where you'd really be struggling.Honestly I think 5E made a very serious mistake by making CHA an important stat for a full third of character classes (primary for a quarter), which is not the case with any other stats. Especially as those classes synergize really well together in other ways too. They should probably have made Warlocks INT, or INT or CHA. Imagine the amount of silly multiclass shenanigans that just wouldn't happen if Warlocks were INT!</blockquote>