Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9136443" data-attributes="member: 2525">That's the thing it's NOT just one specific build. The overwhelming majority of what's involved you automatically get as a bladelock or would naturally choose because it's the options the class gives to focus on things a bladelock does. Treantmonk literally was just tossing normal stuff at it and hand not even bothered to pick a subclass for it or all the enhancements which might come with a subclass. Nor had he spent all invocations on this, leaving room for other things for that Warlock not focused on this strategy. He wasn't even optimizing for this build - this is mostly what someone would just stumble into if they barely knew what they were doing with a bladelock. There. There it is again. You keep making this provably false claim. You and I have discussed the meaningful difference between three weapon attacks and three EB attacks, you acknowledged you'd never said they were the same, but then you go right back to this claim they've had "three attacks" since 2014 knowing the discussion isn't about "three attacks" but about "three weapon attacks."Well sure because you keep strawmanning the argument and pretending they're talking about three EB attacks knowing they're not.Start by honestly repeating the argument you're responding to and stop calling it 3 "attacks" as if that's EB attacks.</blockquote>