Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 8583990" data-attributes="member: 6879661">The sad thing, is that if a world like that was actually fleshed out and done properly instead of in a snapshot featurette I would be absolutely stoked. Unfortunately here we will have unconnected vignettes that will only ever offer a glimpse. Believe me if this book was split into three chapters each in a different cultural setting or had continuity from the cultural settings in Candlekeep I think that would be awesome.I think you’re flattering us all if you think our threads have impact on the overall success of WOCs books. It’s great that artists come on here. I’ve personally thanked one of the writers of Ubersreik Adventures when he replied to one of my posts. With all due respect it’s not sensible to come into a forum if you don’t want to hear other peoples opinions.You mistake some of the criticism here as being towards the writers/creative work when in fact it’s a criticism of the structure of the book and it’s place in the schedule which is down to the editorial/project team/exec.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Saying you don’t like short unconnected adventure anthologies is not bigoted.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Saying that you want another element of D&D selected is not bigoted.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Saying that you want some continuity between these adventures is not bigoted.</li> </ul>Claiming it is, really doesn’t help the situation. It’s a method of trying to shut down disagreement by imputing some pretty nasty qualities.If this was a Ghosts of Saltmarsh and the adventures built on each other there wouldn’t be the complaints. I have a major issue with WOCs decision to publish anthologies with a tenuous link to a location that they then leave behind that location to go to totally different places. In my opinion that is a valid criticism. You may not think it matters. You are free to ignore.</blockquote>

Verification