Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Next D&D Book is JOURNEYS THROUGH THE RADIANT CITADEL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 8584658" data-attributes="member: 7023887"><p>This book is almost definitely allowing all of these settings to be opened up on the DMs Guild, which will allow the authors of these adventures to expand upon their worlds after it's published. </p><p></p><p>I personally don't care about having 15 fully fleshed out worlds in a single adventures book. The little tastes of it that we've been told will be contained in these adventures will probably be enough for me until their creators expand upon them on the DMsGuild. </p><p></p><p>I've seen people on this site post in threads discussing certain WotC books about how this site either encouraged them to buy a book or made them not buy one. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that we have a huge role in the success of the books . . . but we still have a role. That was the important part, to me. </p><p></p><p>"This book sucks because they're newer writers" isn't an opinion. It's a falsehood. "This book will be all fluffy, happy funtimes, and this direction is ruining D&D" is not an opinion. It's a falsehood. "The writers of this book were only chosen because of their skin color" is not an opinion. It's a bigoted falsehood. </p><p></p><p>I've seen all of those and more posted in this thread and others like it. They aren't "opinions", they're inaccurate statements posted to dissuade people from buying this book. </p><p></p><p>"I don't like adventure compilations" is an opinion. "I would prefer a different book to this one to be published" is an opinion. "I don't like the art style" is an opinion. All of those (and more) are valid. I'm not complaining about those. As I said before, I am absolutely okay with people not buying this book because it's not for them. I am not okay with people lying about it and trying to get people to boycott this book because it wasn't specifically designed for them. (I have seen both happen in discussions about this book.)</p><p></p><p>I never said any of that nonsense. Stop misrepresenting my position. As has been pointed out, there have been bigoted people trying to keep people from buying this book in not only this thread, but similar ones. I never called people that don't like adventure anthologies, that like interconnected adventures, or would prefer another book bigoted. I never said any of that BS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Levistus's_Leviathan, post: 8584658, member: 7023887"] This book is almost definitely allowing all of these settings to be opened up on the DMs Guild, which will allow the authors of these adventures to expand upon their worlds after it's published. I personally don't care about having 15 fully fleshed out worlds in a single adventures book. The little tastes of it that we've been told will be contained in these adventures will probably be enough for me until their creators expand upon them on the DMsGuild. I've seen people on this site post in threads discussing certain WotC books about how this site either encouraged them to buy a book or made them not buy one. I'm not saying that we have a huge role in the success of the books . . . but we still have a role. That was the important part, to me. "This book sucks because they're newer writers" isn't an opinion. It's a falsehood. "This book will be all fluffy, happy funtimes, and this direction is ruining D&D" is not an opinion. It's a falsehood. "The writers of this book were only chosen because of their skin color" is not an opinion. It's a bigoted falsehood. I've seen all of those and more posted in this thread and others like it. They aren't "opinions", they're inaccurate statements posted to dissuade people from buying this book. "I don't like adventure compilations" is an opinion. "I would prefer a different book to this one to be published" is an opinion. "I don't like the art style" is an opinion. All of those (and more) are valid. I'm not complaining about those. As I said before, I am absolutely okay with people not buying this book because it's not for them. I am not okay with people lying about it and trying to get people to boycott this book because it wasn't specifically designed for them. (I have seen both happen in discussions about this book.) I never said any of that nonsense. Stop misrepresenting my position. As has been pointed out, there have been bigoted people trying to keep people from buying this book in not only this thread, but similar ones. I never called people that don't like adventure anthologies, that like interconnected adventures, or would prefer another book bigoted. I never said any of that BS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Next D&D Book is JOURNEYS THROUGH THE RADIANT CITADEL
Top