Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The October D&D Book is Fizban’s Treasury of Dragons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 8342050" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p>That's not what happened. You may recall it that way -- but if so -- your recollection is simply wrong. (I'm inviting you to back-pedal gracefully.)</p><p>Moreover, there were explicit apologies made over the depiction of Drow. We don't have to have an argument about that, right?</p><p></p><p>WotC requested changes to <em>Dragons of Deceit </em>for "sensitivity reasons" (including the use of a love potion - the rapey but <em>not too </em>rapey (well yes, still <strong>very </strong>rapey <em>sine qua non</em> of any fantasy witch's shop), the changes were made as requested and WotC approved the manuscript for publishing and payment of their 2nd milestone by Penguin Random House (Del-Rey). Where you got the idea that W&H gave up is wholly nonsense. They didn't. They continued to write and when WotC refused to approve further milestone drafts of Vol 2 -- Weiss and Hickman sued them. During a pandemic.</p><p></p><p>That is about as far from "giving up" that I've seen practicing law for 26 years.</p><p></p><p>I might also add that there aren't many statements of claim I read that persuade me utterly that the case is ripe for summary judgment. This complaint was one of the few that did. WotC had no defense to that claim in contract. ZERO defense to that claim. The only defense WotC might have had was as to quantum of damages. Which is why they settled it and those books are coming out.</p><p></p><p>As for Gully Dwarves, well that's one spin. It isn't the one I would ever admit to, either. Nor should W&H or WotC -- or anybody else.</p><p></p><p>That said, my guess is that Gully Dwarves aren't in <em>Dragons of Deceit</em> - and if they were - W&H would have been asked to remove them. Whatever it is that Weiss and Hickman were asked to remove, they did. WotC approved it.</p><p></p><p>You need to go back and read the complaint. It's here: <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7245020-Weis.html" target="_blank">DocumentCloud</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 8342050, member: 20741"] That's not what happened. You may recall it that way -- but if so -- your recollection is simply wrong. (I'm inviting you to back-pedal gracefully.) Moreover, there were explicit apologies made over the depiction of Drow. We don't have to have an argument about that, right? WotC requested changes to [I]Dragons of Deceit [/I]for "sensitivity reasons" (including the use of a love potion - the rapey but [I]not too [/I]rapey (well yes, still [B]very [/B]rapey [I]sine qua non[/I] of any fantasy witch's shop), the changes were made as requested and WotC approved the manuscript for publishing and payment of their 2nd milestone by Penguin Random House (Del-Rey). Where you got the idea that W&H gave up is wholly nonsense. They didn't. They continued to write and when WotC refused to approve further milestone drafts of Vol 2 -- Weiss and Hickman sued them. During a pandemic. That is about as far from "giving up" that I've seen practicing law for 26 years. I might also add that there aren't many statements of claim I read that persuade me utterly that the case is ripe for summary judgment. This complaint was one of the few that did. WotC had no defense to that claim in contract. ZERO defense to that claim. The only defense WotC might have had was as to quantum of damages. Which is why they settled it and those books are coming out. As for Gully Dwarves, well that's one spin. It isn't the one I would ever admit to, either. Nor should W&H or WotC -- or anybody else. That said, my guess is that Gully Dwarves aren't in [I]Dragons of Deceit[/I] - and if they were - W&H would have been asked to remove them. Whatever it is that Weiss and Hickman were asked to remove, they did. WotC approved it. You need to go back and read the complaint. It's here: [URL='https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7245020-Weis.html']DocumentCloud[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The October D&D Book is Fizban’s Treasury of Dragons
Top