Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Darrin Drader" data-source="post: 847058" data-attributes="member: 7394">Re: Re: The OGC ChallengeI completely agree with those two. I also think Bastion Press is pretty good about both designating OGC and opening up as much material as possible as OGC. Green Ronin also does a good job of designating OGC.I'm of the opinion that opening up as much material as possible as OGC is a good thing, especially when it comes to rules expansions. For example, there will soon be 3 D20 mass combat systems on the market. All will be different. Had this been tackled by a company at an earlier time and the system opened up as OGC, assuming it is good, the smart companies would use that material and then all players would be using the same rules standard system for this purpose.Of course that may be just a pipe dream of mine. I know that some players will actually buy more than 1 version of the rules covering a particular topic just to be able to say which one is better.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Darrin Drader, post: 847058, member: 7394"] [b]Re: Re: The OGC Challenge[/b] I completely agree with those two. I also think Bastion Press is pretty good about both designating OGC and opening up as much material as possible as OGC. Green Ronin also does a good job of designating OGC. I'm of the opinion that opening up as much material as possible as OGC is a good thing, especially when it comes to rules expansions. For example, there will soon be 3 D20 mass combat systems on the market. All will be different. Had this been tackled by a company at an earlier time and the system opened up as OGC, assuming it is good, the smart companies would use that material and then all players would be using the same rules standard system for this purpose. Of course that may be just a pipe dream of mine. I know that some players will actually buy more than 1 version of the rules covering a particular topic just to be able to say which one is better. [/QUOTE]

Verification