Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 8874057" data-attributes="member: 7034611">yes, because they are not licensed under the OGL. As I said in my first reply already, this does not mean the OGL is not open, it only means they are not covered by itwell, you are wrong and clearly do not properly distinguish between SRD, OGC and OGL.The rest is just more you not distinguishing SRD, OGC and OGL. Yes, not 100% of the SRD is also OGC, that is how you arrive at your ‘the SRD is 95% open’ which again tells us nothing at all about whether the OGL is an open license, or rather it tells us that it is but only covers 95% of the SRD… that part being the OGCCould there be fewer restrictions and the OGL remains open, sure, but none of the restrictions it contains make it not an open license.As to you not being able to use the name of someone without permission, that makes a lot of sense. Why should you be able to eg advertise your adventure as ‘with contributions by Gary Gygax’ only because you base it on the OGL and he contributed to the content of the OGC but did not write a single word of your content.</blockquote>