Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 8876239" data-attributes="member: 8461">It's questionable if a court ruling would ever have found that the OGL v1.0 not mentioning registered trademarks in their Section 7, as opposed to just trademarks, meant that registered trademarks weren't covered. What's arguable is that the update doesn't necessarily constitute any additional restrictions on the license; even that's only relevant because the idea was put forward that no version of the OGL can have additional restrictions (beyond those of the original version of the license) without it being a Section 2 violation...which is clearly not the case, since WotC's announcement of what the OGL v1.1 will contain already makes mention of several types of additional restrictions.</blockquote>