Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The old LG vs CN problem….
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6686962" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Lying itself is such a broad category that I don't want to touch it as a whole. It requires an answer to the question, "Are all deceptions, even in a broken world, evil?" Certainly self-interested lies are at least chaotic, like so called 'little white lies', and self-interested lies that harm the receiver are certainly also evil. But what about a lie that is not self-interested, is not cowardly but courageous, and protects the innocent from immediate harm? For example, if the Nazi's come banging on your door, are you required to tell them that you have Jews hiding in your basement if they ask? I won't attempt an answer to such a complex question here, even if I could assume that I could fit such a discussion in a two axis framework.</p><p></p><p>But treachery? Treachery is evil. Betrayal is evil. Betrayal is bottom circle of hell sort of evil. It's a crime against faith, hope, and love combined, and advances the cause of evil faster than just about anything. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, the problem isn't killing per se. The problem is the circumstances and the means. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sort of agree. Neutral if they tell someone in town, "We've got some brigands locked up in the old moat house. They'll probably get a bit thirsty and hungry soon, and might be more amendable to throwing their arms and coming along quietly." Evil if they don't care how they die or intend them to die. Even if they agree that something has to die, good aligned characters believe that even the death should be merciful. </p><p></p><p>As for the reasons for the deal, I agree that its possible that there are mitigating circumstances around forming the deal - rescuing an innocent hostage, for example. I think even in that situation, the LG paladin would be up front about how limited the deal really is and what the terms are: "Take the treasure and go. I'll give you a day to clear out and make yourself scarce. But understand, this isn't amnesty. I'm only doing this to save the life of the girl. If I ever see you again, you'll face justice. And if I hear about your further crimes, I'll be sure you see me soon." Still, failure to clarify the terms is a lack of wisdom, and not evil or chaotic action. </p><p></p><p>But lacking specific terms to the deal, good demands generosity and law demands you be fair. Immediately trying to find a way to back out of the agreement, is simply being treacherous.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6686962, member: 4937"] Lying itself is such a broad category that I don't want to touch it as a whole. It requires an answer to the question, "Are all deceptions, even in a broken world, evil?" Certainly self-interested lies are at least chaotic, like so called 'little white lies', and self-interested lies that harm the receiver are certainly also evil. But what about a lie that is not self-interested, is not cowardly but courageous, and protects the innocent from immediate harm? For example, if the Nazi's come banging on your door, are you required to tell them that you have Jews hiding in your basement if they ask? I won't attempt an answer to such a complex question here, even if I could assume that I could fit such a discussion in a two axis framework. But treachery? Treachery is evil. Betrayal is evil. Betrayal is bottom circle of hell sort of evil. It's a crime against faith, hope, and love combined, and advances the cause of evil faster than just about anything. Again, the problem isn't killing per se. The problem is the circumstances and the means. Sort of agree. Neutral if they tell someone in town, "We've got some brigands locked up in the old moat house. They'll probably get a bit thirsty and hungry soon, and might be more amendable to throwing their arms and coming along quietly." Evil if they don't care how they die or intend them to die. Even if they agree that something has to die, good aligned characters believe that even the death should be merciful. As for the reasons for the deal, I agree that its possible that there are mitigating circumstances around forming the deal - rescuing an innocent hostage, for example. I think even in that situation, the LG paladin would be up front about how limited the deal really is and what the terms are: "Take the treasure and go. I'll give you a day to clear out and make yourself scarce. But understand, this isn't amnesty. I'm only doing this to save the life of the girl. If I ever see you again, you'll face justice. And if I hear about your further crimes, I'll be sure you see me soon." Still, failure to clarify the terms is a lack of wisdom, and not evil or chaotic action. But lacking specific terms to the deal, good demands generosity and law demands you be fair. Immediately trying to find a way to back out of the agreement, is simply being treacherous. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The old LG vs CN problem….
Top