Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="His Dudeness" data-source="post: 5369266" data-attributes="member: 94782">As a limited 3.x player I must say that I really don't like the system. Feats limits what you can do, and the same goes for skills. Multiclassing feels silly, since you end up "dipping" which is a silly concept because a class is your profession and what you do. When does a fighter takes time to become a wizard? I can't really get my head arround that.I fail to see the appeal of an unified xp chart. Sure, John the thief levels faster than anyone, but he has a d4 hit die and can't hit the broad side of a barn. This comes from someone that is new to roleplaying games, since I've been playing for about 4 years give or take.I understand that the alternative is GM fiat and the chances of having a crappy GM are many.But if I'm playing with that person it means that I trust his judgement and I respect it's authority. I'm not at the table to argue or search rules, I'm there to have a fun time and excess rules get in the way of that.[MENTION=85870]innerdude[/MENTION]I think the older editions are the most modular of them all, since you can add or remove a piacere and the game still works perfectly fine, because they were created organically when a ruling was needed. I don't think you can do that with newer editions and the approach of a unified mechanic.</blockquote>