Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The "Old School Revival" - The Light Bulb Goes On
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5372077" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>The limitations of the English language and my necessary position within the debate make it difficult to introduce the full level of nuance I have on the topic into the debate. There is I think some give back and forth between culture and law. A particular culture is more likely to flourish under a set of particular laws, or may be more accurately, a set of laws tend to push toward certain cultures and away from others. But its not as hard of a shove as we usually think it is, and so to make that point stick as well as I can, I'm tending to ignore the in my opinion quite small effect law has on culture. So yes, there is a limit, and when you get closer to where I think it is then I'll be happy to admit it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One of the first complaints you hear when you break out of the culture will be some variation of 'that's against the rules'. I can just imagine someone going, "Well of course you have a different experience, because you added a new mechanical restriction to the game - 'Everyone has to play a goblin.' - and thats why the game was different." But I think you'd agree with me that it wasn't the mechanical difference of being a goblin (compared to some other race) that created most of what was different about the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But the thing you have to consider is that there is a culture to game creation that determines alot of that as well. If I ran my house rules for D&D and I also bumped up the CR of all opponents by 4 or so, with no mechanical changes I could run a pretty straight up Call of Cthullu game with all the attendent changes to how players approached or felt they had to approach the game. All the sudden those 'Deep Ones' encountered at level 1 would go from fearsome foes greatly to be respected, to virtually unstoppable killing machines greatly to be avoided and quite capable of inspiring fear and horror. Now granted, this is facillitated partly by the fact that the Ravenloft Fear/Horror/Madness rules are incorporated in a standard way to my house rules, but the culture of the game created by simply changing the expected difficulty of a fight with a monster is huge.</p><p></p><p>And likewise GURPS can run Call of Cthullu pretty well as well just by changing the games culture and tropes to 'Call of Cthullu'. I don't know 'Savage Worlds', but I'd be willing to bet...</p><p></p><p>One of the things I like about new players is that they don't bring these preconceptions to the table, so that if I run D&D as a strict horror game no one feels like I'm doing badwrongfun because the game they have isn't the game they believe D&D is. Experienced players of course have played D&D (and probably one or more other systems) as a horror game, a high fantasy game, a low fantasy game, a gritty realism game, a superhero game, a melodramatic nar game, and a bit of everything else under the sun and so they are mainly just curious to find out what sort of game they are in before they relax and get into it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is certainly true, but you can't draw the inference that if a rules system is failing to provide a particular experience that the failure can be ammended by changing the rules. Nor can you be assured that if you are having a particular experience with a game that it is a result of the rules.</p><p></p><p>And to really make matters complex, I'm the sort of person who tends to treat portions of the text that I feel are related to creating a particular culture as mere guidelines for novices to be discarded or replaced as needed to create the particular game I want, and I don't feel like I'm changing 'the rules' (as for example in deciding that average EL should be EL+4, or your groups decision to all be goblins), where as some people reading the text will tend to treat that sort of thing as having every bit of importance as the mechanical resolution and will treat me (or whoever) as someone who is 'breaking the rules'.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5372077, member: 4937"] The limitations of the English language and my necessary position within the debate make it difficult to introduce the full level of nuance I have on the topic into the debate. There is I think some give back and forth between culture and law. A particular culture is more likely to flourish under a set of particular laws, or may be more accurately, a set of laws tend to push toward certain cultures and away from others. But its not as hard of a shove as we usually think it is, and so to make that point stick as well as I can, I'm tending to ignore the in my opinion quite small effect law has on culture. So yes, there is a limit, and when you get closer to where I think it is then I'll be happy to admit it. One of the first complaints you hear when you break out of the culture will be some variation of 'that's against the rules'. I can just imagine someone going, "Well of course you have a different experience, because you added a new mechanical restriction to the game - 'Everyone has to play a goblin.' - and thats why the game was different." But I think you'd agree with me that it wasn't the mechanical difference of being a goblin (compared to some other race) that created most of what was different about the game. But the thing you have to consider is that there is a culture to game creation that determines alot of that as well. If I ran my house rules for D&D and I also bumped up the CR of all opponents by 4 or so, with no mechanical changes I could run a pretty straight up Call of Cthullu game with all the attendent changes to how players approached or felt they had to approach the game. All the sudden those 'Deep Ones' encountered at level 1 would go from fearsome foes greatly to be respected, to virtually unstoppable killing machines greatly to be avoided and quite capable of inspiring fear and horror. Now granted, this is facillitated partly by the fact that the Ravenloft Fear/Horror/Madness rules are incorporated in a standard way to my house rules, but the culture of the game created by simply changing the expected difficulty of a fight with a monster is huge. And likewise GURPS can run Call of Cthullu pretty well as well just by changing the games culture and tropes to 'Call of Cthullu'. I don't know 'Savage Worlds', but I'd be willing to bet... One of the things I like about new players is that they don't bring these preconceptions to the table, so that if I run D&D as a strict horror game no one feels like I'm doing badwrongfun because the game they have isn't the game they believe D&D is. Experienced players of course have played D&D (and probably one or more other systems) as a horror game, a high fantasy game, a low fantasy game, a gritty realism game, a superhero game, a melodramatic nar game, and a bit of everything else under the sun and so they are mainly just curious to find out what sort of game they are in before they relax and get into it. This is certainly true, but you can't draw the inference that if a rules system is failing to provide a particular experience that the failure can be ammended by changing the rules. Nor can you be assured that if you are having a particular experience with a game that it is a result of the rules. And to really make matters complex, I'm the sort of person who tends to treat portions of the text that I feel are related to creating a particular culture as mere guidelines for novices to be discarded or replaced as needed to create the particular game I want, and I don't feel like I'm changing 'the rules' (as for example in deciding that average EL should be EL+4, or your groups decision to all be goblins), where as some people reading the text will tend to treat that sort of thing as having every bit of importance as the mechanical resolution and will treat me (or whoever) as someone who is 'breaking the rules'. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The "Old School Revival" - The Light Bulb Goes On
Top