Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 5025395" data-attributes="member: 2205">Yeah, you're just wrong there.  Your memory is either faulty or misinformted.  Paizo have been very upfront about wanting to migrate to 4e, being frustrated by the delays in the GSL, and ultimately had to make a gamble that they would have preferred not to have been forced into. Well that's an easy question.  At the announcement of 4e at GenCon 2007, Scott Rouse specifically said it was going to be open.  Why would anyone not think that it was going to be?Again... faulty or uninformed memory.Possibly.  But you didn't know that.  None of us knew that.  That was one of the big questions that was being bandied about for months, with no answers forthcoming for some time.And you'd continue to be as wrong as you have been generally so far in this thread.  Paizo needed 1) a continuous revenue stream, to pay their employees and stay in business, and 2) sufficient lead time on products that provided that revenue stream.  The GSL delays and uncertainties about what it would allow quite literally forced Paizo into the decision that they made.  True; they could choose to support the 4e GSL now but that ship's already sailed strategically.</blockquote>