Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Terwox" data-source="post: 2656332" data-attributes="member: 1044">Interestingly, no one has mentioned a monk once.  Heck, neither would I.  They're fun and all, but not my thing.Single classed, I'd just go dwarf fighter, elven rogue, human cleric, human wizard, and a sentient half-red dragon black ooze paladin.  (It's core, it's core!) <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I'm playing a bard right now and I'm not too keen on it as the fifth-man.  Party is an elf ranger2, 78 year old fighter1/cleric1 whose physical stat mods equal -6, a human swashbuckler2, a human rogue2 who dropped, and a human bard2, me.  I could do a lot more... stuff, I guess, as a different class, but our bases aren't covered at all.Five man groups I've seen effective -- fighter, sorc, druid, spellsword, psionicist worked fine.  (Fighter was a dhampir, sorc was a dire badger, druid was an elf, spellsword was a human, psionicist was human with physical stats of -9, but that some of that part isn't very core.)Nonstandard groups I'd consider to be effective:A circle of five conjurors who were very very cautious and summoned creatures to do their work, or better yet, a circle of four conjurors with an impatient barbarian would be a good party, or a good sitcom.As for nonstandard I'd like to see played, I'd like to see a ranger, a rogue, a druid, an illusionist, and a barbarian, all of them specialized in stealth.</blockquote>

Verification