Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DaveMage" data-source="post: 8498197" data-attributes="member: 10447">I think this is a good point.&nbsp; As a Pathfinder 1E fan, I don't remember ever being given a compelling reason to move to 2E.&nbsp; In fact, all I saw through the 2E development process was how the system changes were reflecting a D&amp;D 4e look more than anything else.&nbsp; (My disgust with 4e was, of course, why I went to Pathfinder in the first place.)I'm still playing Pathfinder 1E, so I still visit the Paizo forums (occasionally) when I'm looking for info in the 1E product threads when I'm running those adventures, but I'm not making many new posts, only seeing what is already there.&nbsp;&nbsp; (No need to post Pathfinder 1E stuff at EN World either.)&nbsp; I will also drop by the Paizo boards when there is union talk, since I find that interesting.&nbsp; And I can't help but read James Jacobs AMA thread.&nbsp; That guy is a gaming treasure.&nbsp; Whatever they are paying him, it's too low.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DaveMage, post: 8498197, member: 10447"] I think this is a good point. As a Pathfinder 1E fan, I don't remember ever being given a compelling reason to move to 2E. In fact, all I saw through the 2E development process was how the system changes were reflecting a D&D 4e look more than anything else. (My disgust with 4e was, of course, why I went to Pathfinder in the first place.) I'm still playing Pathfinder 1E, so I still visit the Paizo forums (occasionally) when I'm looking for info in the 1E product threads when I'm running those adventures, but I'm not making many new posts, only seeing what is already there. (No need to post Pathfinder 1E stuff at EN World either.) I will also drop by the Paizo boards when there is union talk, since I find that interesting. And I can't help but read James Jacobs AMA thread. That guy is a gaming treasure. Whatever they are paying him, it's too low. [/QUOTE]

Verification