Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The perfect D&D edition (according to ENWORLD)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest 6801328" data-source="post: 7629427"><p>I had to take a call just as I started responding to this, and I'm glad I did because I was about to lash out angrily. Which is a fairly human response when somebody has just denigrated you (again).</p><p></p><p>Ok....deep breath.</p><p></p><p>Upthread you made a joking aside about laser guns in the game. So please step through the following with me. I was tempted to use, oh, maybe global warming as an analogue, but I'll stick to RPGs:</p><p></p><p>1) First, do you think the inclusion of guns as an option in the DMG has increased the likelihood/frequency of guns appearing in the game? For example, a player wants to use a gun, and although the DM doesn't love the idea, is persuaded "Well, it's in the DMG, so it can't be all bad." Simple yes or no. If yes, skip to #3. Otherwise proceed to #2.</p><p></p><p>2) Even if you think it does <em>not</em> (which would astonish me, but whatever) would you find it plausible that somebody else <em>does</em> believe that? You may think they are wrong, but some other person does believe that the presence of official options increases their frequency. Can you imagine that? Does it make them a bad or selfish person for believing that?</p><p></p><p>3) Would you find it plausible that somebody might believe that the inclusion of guns is detrimental to the game, even if that person isn't forced to use them? Even if it never even shows up at their own table? That is, that an increasing appearance of firearms could presage a shift away from the genre that D&D originally represented, leading to more and more technology and other "anachronisms" (for lack of a better word.) Again, I'm not asking if you agree that this cause and effect will always unfold, but can you imagine that somebody might genuinely believe in it?</p><p></p><p>4) If that person, who believes 1-3, speaks up...or had spoken up in 2014...and says, "Hey, I don't think guns should be an official option, not just because I don't want guns at my table but because it encourages a shift in a direction I think is bad for the game" are they spitefully trying to prevent other people from having fun? </p><p></p><p>And I'm really just looking for the answer to #4.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 6801328, post: 7629427"] I had to take a call just as I started responding to this, and I'm glad I did because I was about to lash out angrily. Which is a fairly human response when somebody has just denigrated you (again). Ok....deep breath. Upthread you made a joking aside about laser guns in the game. So please step through the following with me. I was tempted to use, oh, maybe global warming as an analogue, but I'll stick to RPGs: 1) First, do you think the inclusion of guns as an option in the DMG has increased the likelihood/frequency of guns appearing in the game? For example, a player wants to use a gun, and although the DM doesn't love the idea, is persuaded "Well, it's in the DMG, so it can't be all bad." Simple yes or no. If yes, skip to #3. Otherwise proceed to #2. 2) Even if you think it does [I]not[/I] (which would astonish me, but whatever) would you find it plausible that somebody else [I]does[/I] believe that? You may think they are wrong, but some other person does believe that the presence of official options increases their frequency. Can you imagine that? Does it make them a bad or selfish person for believing that? 3) Would you find it plausible that somebody might believe that the inclusion of guns is detrimental to the game, even if that person isn't forced to use them? Even if it never even shows up at their own table? That is, that an increasing appearance of firearms could presage a shift away from the genre that D&D originally represented, leading to more and more technology and other "anachronisms" (for lack of a better word.) Again, I'm not asking if you agree that this cause and effect will always unfold, but can you imagine that somebody might genuinely believe in it? 4) If that person, who believes 1-3, speaks up...or had spoken up in 2014...and says, "Hey, I don't think guns should be an official option, not just because I don't want guns at my table but because it encourages a shift in a direction I think is bad for the game" are they spitefully trying to prevent other people from having fun? And I'm really just looking for the answer to #4. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The perfect D&D edition (according to ENWORLD)
Top