Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ClaytonCross" data-source="post: 7561440" data-attributes="member: 6880599">Yes which proves his point in that if post are a measure of validity Morrus's 39,521 post to your 3,940 posts would make you a n00b and irrelevant if we are calling that a valid maker of knowledge base. Which we are not. So while your one of the more interesting posters to read you do have a tendency to get a bit dismissive of posters based on off point arguments like posts. I still came to your thread because you make interesting discussion and I heard you. <a href="https://dndbeyond.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360026773094-Allowing-Player-tags-to-actively-improve-D-D-Beyond-data-gathering" target="_blank">I have even posted a on the D&amp;D Beyond feature requests asking for player inactive characters tags and a statement on slides listing the day delimiter so as we read slides we have a beater representation of what the slide is depicting</a>.&nbsp; That said, questioning the validity of one someone says based on how much they said instead of the content of their argument makes you look bad, instead of making them look unqualified. If your going to say the statement was in jest... their is no indication in the text of the post that implies that and the person your posting to does not know you well enough to infer that in plain text. Try to not use meta reasons to &quot;win&quot; an agreement through dismissing the debater instead of arguing the point of the debate, please. @<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=1" target="_blank">Morrus</a> is correct that it is gatekeeping, pointless, and unnecessary for you to be heard, since many of us actually came to your thread to see what you had to say.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ClaytonCross, post: 7561440, member: 6880599"] [B]Yes which proves his point[/B] in that if post are a measure of validity Morrus's 39,521 post to your 3,940 posts would make you a n00b and irrelevant if we are calling that a valid maker of knowledge base. [B]Which we are not[/B]. So while your one of the more interesting posters to read you do have a tendency to get a bit dismissive of posters based on off point arguments like posts. I still came to your thread because you make interesting discussion and I heard you. [URL="https://dndbeyond.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360026773094-Allowing-Player-tags-to-actively-improve-D-D-Beyond-data-gathering"]I have even posted a on the D&D Beyond feature requests asking for player inactive characters tags and a statement on slides listing the day delimiter so as we read slides we have a beater representation of what the slide is depicting[/URL]. That said, questioning the validity of one someone says based on how much they said instead of the content of their argument makes you look bad, instead of making them look unqualified. If your going to say the statement was in jest... their is no indication in the text of the post that implies that and the person your posting to does not know you well enough to infer that in plain text. Try to not use meta reasons to "win" an agreement through dismissing the debater instead of arguing the point of the debate, [I]please[/I]. @[I][B][U][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=1"]Morrus[/URL][/U][/B][/I] is correct that it is gatekeeping, pointless, and unnecessary for you to be heard, since many of us actually came to your thread to see what you had to say. [/QUOTE]

Verification