Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 7562042" data-attributes="member: 2525">It's not a vendetta. I've tried to match your tone, and found you to be very evasive in this thread for some reason. You make an accusation about what people have said, you're asked for an example and refuse to give it. You make a comment about something, people ask you to clarify because what you said doesn't seem to make sense to them, and you make a snarky reply and get angry. Someone tried to make an assessment and you had the gaul to dismiss their opinion because of their post count. You dismiss the value of some data, I fairly characterize that back to you in the same kinds of terms you used to describe it, and you get upset seeing that characterization repeated back to you. Someone tries to make an assessment of DND Beyond data and you tell them to go start their own thread. This, to me, is very evasive behavior. And I keep giving you opportinunities to clarify, and you keep getting angry every time I do that as well. Almost like you're upset someone doesn't just blindly agree with you. And now you're accusing me of a vendetta over, no joke, my asking you if you meant &quot;invaluable&quot; or not because it wasn't clear to me (and I said it was not clear to me outright). If you don't want to talk about this topic, or don't want to talk about it with me, that's cool. Then don't reply to me.&nbsp; But if you're curious about why I find this topic worth talking about, I am more than happy to discuss it. Since you raised my motives, I'd think you'd ask me first rather than just jumping to an accusation of a vendetta (over what, I have no clue).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 7562042, member: 2525"] It's not a vendetta. I've tried to match your tone, and found you to be very evasive in this thread for some reason. You make an accusation about what people have said, you're asked for an example and refuse to give it. You make a comment about something, people ask you to clarify because what you said doesn't seem to make sense to them, and you make a snarky reply and get angry. Someone tried to make an assessment and you had the gaul to dismiss their opinion because of their post count. You dismiss the value of some data, I fairly characterize that back to you in the same kinds of terms you used to describe it, and you get upset seeing that characterization repeated back to you. Someone tries to make an assessment of DND Beyond data and you tell them to go start their own thread. This, to me, is very evasive behavior. And I keep giving you opportinunities to clarify, and you keep getting angry every time I do that as well. Almost like you're upset someone doesn't just blindly agree with you. And now you're accusing me of a vendetta over, no joke, my asking you if you meant "invaluable" or not because it wasn't clear to me (and I said it was not clear to me outright). If you don't want to talk about this topic, or don't want to talk about it with me, that's cool. Then don't reply to me. But if you're curious about why I find this topic worth talking about, I am more than happy to discuss it. Since you raised my motives, I'd think you'd ask me first rather than just jumping to an accusation of a vendetta (over what, I have no clue). [/QUOTE]

Verification