Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ClaytonCross" data-source="post: 7562812" data-attributes="member: 6880599">I could be wrong but that sounds like a problem with clear headers stating what data is presented not the value or accuracy of the data. I understand your point but when I tried to make a simple header to disclaimer that I realized that having to state classes without sufficient levels used to include subclasses or in which subclass were not selected is redundant to &quot;SUBCLASS DISTRIBITION (Active Characters)&quot; since it could be implied that lack of Distribution by due to insufficient levels to be eligible for subclass election or because the player has opted not to make a selection would fail to qualify for the survey. I understand you complaints about multi-classing but in that case NOT counting distribution of subclasses by characters who have a subclass from another class would be less accurate since poll amounts to the number of a subclass by someone who elected a class. Evan as a multi-class both classes and both subclasses were elected and eligible. Not reflecting that would make data incorrect with stated goals. That does mean some characters are counted twice if they have a second class with a subclass. But it also means no class and subclass was selected on an active character that was not polled. Not polling those subclasses would make the pole entirely wrong for sake of poling which subclasses were selected each time a class allowed a subclass selection and one was chosen.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ClaytonCross, post: 7562812, member: 6880599"] I could be wrong but that sounds like a problem with clear headers stating what data is presented not the value or accuracy of the data. I understand your point but when I tried to make a simple header to disclaimer that I realized that having to state classes without sufficient levels used to include subclasses or in which subclass were not selected is redundant to "SUBCLASS DISTRIBITION (Active Characters)" since it could be implied that lack of Distribution by due to insufficient levels to be eligible for subclass election or because the player has opted not to make a selection would fail to qualify for the survey. I understand you complaints about multi-classing but in that case NOT counting distribution of subclasses by characters who have a subclass from another class would be less accurate since poll amounts to the number of a subclass by someone who elected a class. Evan as a multi-class both classes and both subclasses were elected and eligible. Not reflecting that would make data incorrect with stated goals. That does mean some characters are counted twice if they have a second class with a subclass. But it also means no class and subclass was selected on an active character that was not polled. Not polling those subclasses would make the pole entirely wrong for sake of poling which subclasses were selected each time a class allowed a subclass selection and one was chosen. [/QUOTE]

Verification