Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7563279" data-attributes="member: 6795602">I disagree.&nbsp; I think my previous post provided the reasons why and I don't want to belabor the disagreement here.&nbsp; &nbsp;I am glad you can change your mind.&nbsp; I can to as long as I see a sufficient reason to do so.Maybe I am, maybe I'm not but please don't turn this discussion into an attempt to prove I am doing the same thing you were.&nbsp; I agree that as long as the title matches the graph that the graph is accurate.&nbsp; Though as I think you seem to indicate, an accurate graph can still be a very inaccurate way to measure player preferences for D&amp;D as a whole BUT they aren't trying to measure player preferences as a whole (even though that's what a good portion of our community tends to use such data for), they are just quantifying player preferences on D&amp;D beyond and for that purpose the graph can be 100% accurate (barring the title snafu of course).So part of what I'm attempting to say on this thread is that for what us forum goers are generally interested in, D&amp;D Beyond data they provided us is a very inaccurate measure of D&amp;D player preferences.I disagree and I've stated my case for why already.&nbsp; I don't think we need to keep repeating ourselves on that part.1.&nbsp; I want the title and presentation and graphics to all match.&nbsp; I believe it doesn't.&nbsp; As long as I believe that then it's fair for me to describe that situation as inaccurate right?2.&nbsp; I agree with you that what the graph they gave isn't what we as a community wanted.&nbsp; It's useful though, it's just not very useful for us IMO.My favorite is &quot;Subclass Distribution (Active Classes with a Subclass)&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 7563279, member: 6795602"] I disagree. I think my previous post provided the reasons why and I don't want to belabor the disagreement here. I am glad you can change your mind. I can to as long as I see a sufficient reason to do so. Maybe I am, maybe I'm not but please don't turn this discussion into an attempt to prove I am doing the same thing you were. I agree that as long as the title matches the graph that the graph is accurate. Though as I think you seem to indicate, an accurate graph can still be a very inaccurate way to measure player preferences for D&D as a whole [B]BUT[/B] they aren't trying to measure player preferences as a whole (even though that's what a good portion of our community tends to use such data for), they are just quantifying player preferences on D&D beyond and for that purpose the graph can be 100% accurate (barring the title snafu of course). So part of what I'm attempting to say on this thread is that for what us forum goers are generally interested in, D&D Beyond data they provided us is a very inaccurate measure of D&D player preferences. I disagree and I've stated my case for why already. I don't think we need to keep repeating ourselves on that part. 1. I want the title and presentation and graphics to all match. I believe it doesn't. As long as I believe that then it's fair for me to describe that situation as inaccurate right? 2. I agree with you that what the graph they gave isn't what we as a community wanted. It's useful though, it's just not very useful for us IMO. My favorite is "Subclass Distribution (Active Classes with a Subclass)" [/QUOTE]

Verification