Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
The Planes of the Obscurati, A List and A Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Echolocation" data-source="post: 8437407" data-attributes="member: 7011911"><p>I should have been clearer. I like your reasoning, I've just opted for a different route (see my response about the MAP proposal).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Definitely. In the list, planes with single energy aspects are moons (there are only four). Of course, I should have stated that in my first post.</p><p></p><p>I thought I had configured the sheet to do this.</p><p></p><p>Will do. Obviously, I will also be deleting Nic's changes when I hand this sheet to my players.</p><p></p><p>I am tempted to have Nic make the changes that are recommended in the Ob convocation, unless it is clear the proposal that won was largely determined by my players. If they just interfered to make small, reasonable changes, I can't see Nic having a huge problem with it. I have already begun the convocation with my players, and I think they will try to combine proposals to thwart the colossus and watchmaker factions. I can see them teaming up with Dame Constance to form a conglomerate proposal. Maybe they will swap a plane or two, I'm not sure.</p><p></p><p>That's fair. As I mentioned, I was worried about overwhelming my players with information. But you could argue this sheet doesn't provide much information at all.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for your insightful response. I'm now thinking it may be better for wait until the MAP proposal is made, and have Dame Constance have a few different options that the players can weigh in on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Echolocation, post: 8437407, member: 7011911"] I should have been clearer. I like your reasoning, I've just opted for a different route (see my response about the MAP proposal). Definitely. In the list, planes with single energy aspects are moons (there are only four). Of course, I should have stated that in my first post. I thought I had configured the sheet to do this. Will do. Obviously, I will also be deleting Nic's changes when I hand this sheet to my players. I am tempted to have Nic make the changes that are recommended in the Ob convocation, unless it is clear the proposal that won was largely determined by my players. If they just interfered to make small, reasonable changes, I can't see Nic having a huge problem with it. I have already begun the convocation with my players, and I think they will try to combine proposals to thwart the colossus and watchmaker factions. I can see them teaming up with Dame Constance to form a conglomerate proposal. Maybe they will swap a plane or two, I'm not sure. That's fair. As I mentioned, I was worried about overwhelming my players with information. But you could argue this sheet doesn't provide much information at all. Thanks for your insightful response. I'm now thinking it may be better for wait until the MAP proposal is made, and have Dame Constance have a few different options that the players can weigh in on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
The Planes of the Obscurati, A List and A Question
Top