Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Player's Quantum Ogre: Warlock Pacts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9748829" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>This ignores the possibility that rules can <em>help</em>, by saying that unless rules are perfect defenses, they are useless. This is a perfect solution fallacy: since the solution isn't perfect, it is necessarily useless and should be ignored.</p><p></p><p>Rules can do things like:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Make it much more obvious when a GM is behaving nefariously</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Give players a justified standpoint for providing criticism</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Help well-meaning but inexperienced, unwise, or wrongly-taught GMs see the error of their ways</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Help a "bad DM" <em>realized that</em> they are being a "bad DM" and, thus, potentially desire to change</li> </ul><p></p><p>All of those are worthwhile things to have happen, even if rules fail to provide an absolute, perfect defense against GM misbehavior.</p><p></p><p>Now, of course, I am speaking in hypotheticals--things rules <em>could theoretically</em> do. So it is valid to say, "Well, not <em>all</em> rules can do that, so this doesn't prove rules are <em>better</em>." And that would be correct--but I'm not arguing rules are guaranteed always better. What I am arguing is that this attitude--that because rules cannot perfectly shield against bad GM behavior, they're worthless for doing anything about bad GM behavior--is wrong and harmful. There <em>are</em> tools we can employ which would help. There <em>are</em> structures that could make significant progress, and even (ideally) actually help convert a few bad GMs. It is worth our time as players, and as (armchair) designers, to talk about how rules can <strong>help</strong>, even if they'll never <strong>solve</strong>.</p><p></p><p>After all, isn't that exactly the argument folks like [USER=6747251]@Micah Sweet[/USER] have made in defense of pursuing verisimilitude? There is no ruleset that can achieve perfect verisimilitude--it is provably impossible, even--but that is no excuse for abandoning the quest for it. It just means we must temper our expectations, and focus our efforts on the places which achieve the most gain for low and/or acceptable cost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9748829, member: 6790260"] This ignores the possibility that rules can [I]help[/I], by saying that unless rules are perfect defenses, they are useless. This is a perfect solution fallacy: since the solution isn't perfect, it is necessarily useless and should be ignored. Rules can do things like: [LIST] [*]Make it much more obvious when a GM is behaving nefariously [*]Give players a justified standpoint for providing criticism [*]Help well-meaning but inexperienced, unwise, or wrongly-taught GMs see the error of their ways [*]Help a "bad DM" [I]realized that[/I] they are being a "bad DM" and, thus, potentially desire to change [/LIST] All of those are worthwhile things to have happen, even if rules fail to provide an absolute, perfect defense against GM misbehavior. Now, of course, I am speaking in hypotheticals--things rules [I]could theoretically[/I] do. So it is valid to say, "Well, not [I]all[/I] rules can do that, so this doesn't prove rules are [I]better[/I]." And that would be correct--but I'm not arguing rules are guaranteed always better. What I am arguing is that this attitude--that because rules cannot perfectly shield against bad GM behavior, they're worthless for doing anything about bad GM behavior--is wrong and harmful. There [I]are[/I] tools we can employ which would help. There [I]are[/I] structures that could make significant progress, and even (ideally) actually help convert a few bad GMs. It is worth our time as players, and as (armchair) designers, to talk about how rules can [B]help[/B], even if they'll never [B]solve[/B]. After all, isn't that exactly the argument folks like [USER=6747251]@Micah Sweet[/USER] have made in defense of pursuing verisimilitude? There is no ruleset that can achieve perfect verisimilitude--it is provably impossible, even--but that is no excuse for abandoning the quest for it. It just means we must temper our expectations, and focus our efforts on the places which achieve the most gain for low and/or acceptable cost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Player's Quantum Ogre: Warlock Pacts
Top