Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Possibility of "Too Fantastic" Fantasy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raduin711" data-source="post: 4031629" data-attributes="member: 15303"><p>Good points. However...</p><p></p><p>I would disagree with your statement that putting more fantasy in D&D puts the creative advantage in their corner. I think I can come up with some pretty interesting fantastical ideas... and I think a lot of other people can too. The problem is making those fantastic ideas fit in a slightly mundane setting. You ever notice that in modern fantasies it is harder to explain how we blindly coexist with the supernatural, than it is to explain the supernatural element itself? How in comic books, it is easier to explain the superheroes and villains than it is to explain how regular society exists, just like it is now, beneath them?</p><p></p><p>Vampire: the masquerade: Vampires are decended from Caine. Easy. Vampires keep their existence secret with a set of laws called the masquerade, which helps them keep secrets like mutant-looking vampires, and gargoyles and ancient, all-powerful antediluvian vampires... hard.</p><p></p><p>Fantastic Four: Reed Richards has super stretchability and is one of the world's greatest geniuses. Easy. Reed is always building super technology like things to switch the Four's superpowers around and flying jet cars, yet the people of new york are still driving internal combustion cars and lack any superpowers whatsoever. REALLY HARD.</p><p></p><p>But anyway I think I am getting off track. </p><p></p><p>Your second example, about the Hippogriffs... It certainly sounds dull, but why is it dull?</p><p></p><p>Here are my thoughts: Well, Firstly it is a deus ex machina. Secondly, the plane (or should I say plain) of elemental air, while fantastic, is very dull. Thirdly, talking hippogriffs is fantasy overload. Hippogriffs are fantastic enough as it is. Making them talk for no good reason is silly.</p><p></p><p>I think from what I read recently of Worlds and Monsters, I think you will be all right. </p><p></p><p>They talked in it about "needless symmetry", which brough about such bore-fest planes like the plane of air and the plane of positive energy. (a plane of nothing but air, and a plane of nothing but... positive energy? I'm sorry I must have lost my travel brochure... maybe next year.) I think that they are doing this because they want all the fantasy to be interesting fantasy, and not just be there to fill some percieved gap. </p><p></p><p>As for the fantasy overload, I can't say. I have always felt that tacking half-dragon to everything made the actual dragons seem less interesting, but that is just me. Hopefully they stop at Dragonborn with the half-dragon concept. But then again I know some people want to see dragons absolutely everywhere...</p><p></p><p>So I guess it comes down to how much you believe in WOTC. At least that is my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raduin711, post: 4031629, member: 15303"] Good points. However... I would disagree with your statement that putting more fantasy in D&D puts the creative advantage in their corner. I think I can come up with some pretty interesting fantastical ideas... and I think a lot of other people can too. The problem is making those fantastic ideas fit in a slightly mundane setting. You ever notice that in modern fantasies it is harder to explain how we blindly coexist with the supernatural, than it is to explain the supernatural element itself? How in comic books, it is easier to explain the superheroes and villains than it is to explain how regular society exists, just like it is now, beneath them? Vampire: the masquerade: Vampires are decended from Caine. Easy. Vampires keep their existence secret with a set of laws called the masquerade, which helps them keep secrets like mutant-looking vampires, and gargoyles and ancient, all-powerful antediluvian vampires... hard. Fantastic Four: Reed Richards has super stretchability and is one of the world's greatest geniuses. Easy. Reed is always building super technology like things to switch the Four's superpowers around and flying jet cars, yet the people of new york are still driving internal combustion cars and lack any superpowers whatsoever. REALLY HARD. But anyway I think I am getting off track. Your second example, about the Hippogriffs... It certainly sounds dull, but why is it dull? Here are my thoughts: Well, Firstly it is a deus ex machina. Secondly, the plane (or should I say plain) of elemental air, while fantastic, is very dull. Thirdly, talking hippogriffs is fantasy overload. Hippogriffs are fantastic enough as it is. Making them talk for no good reason is silly. I think from what I read recently of Worlds and Monsters, I think you will be all right. They talked in it about "needless symmetry", which brough about such bore-fest planes like the plane of air and the plane of positive energy. (a plane of nothing but air, and a plane of nothing but... positive energy? I'm sorry I must have lost my travel brochure... maybe next year.) I think that they are doing this because they want all the fantasy to be interesting fantasy, and not just be there to fill some percieved gap. As for the fantasy overload, I can't say. I have always felt that tacking half-dragon to everything made the actual dragons seem less interesting, but that is just me. Hopefully they stop at Dragonborn with the half-dragon concept. But then again I know some people want to see dragons absolutely everywhere... So I guess it comes down to how much you believe in WOTC. At least that is my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Possibility of "Too Fantastic" Fantasy
Top