Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 6338828" data-attributes="member: 6689464"><p>I don't want to sound disrespectful or confrontational, but if you put a 600 pages document in front of me which you claim is the be all, end all of character options -and leaving a door closed to more- I don't really think I can trust you having a fair sense of variety when I'm kind of used to have 1200+ (2e), 1800+(3.5) or 1500+(4e) pages of options and even then they aren't enough. I mean that kind of rings a bell or two too. It tells me that as a DM a) you could be rigid and unapproachable not to mention closed to change, b) this could be a sign you like to micromanage player characters too much (and my worst experiences come from micromanaging DMs, so rather that mistrust this translates into fear), and c) if this is the "most fun" version you could think of, it most likely means you cut down all of the "badwrongfun" (and I thrive and enjoy the most lots of fringe concepts, and I work hard to make them work.). Of course I could make a workable character I could enjoy out of that -I have successfully made a character I liked in 5B and can make wonders with core-only 3.5-, but I'm moody, even slightly flighty, I cannot know what kind of character I will enjoy next, without seeing them I don't know if those 600 pages would be enough for me in the long run.</p></blockquote><p></p>