Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 9105741" data-attributes="member: 6677017">How does this book compare to the fluff in the 2e Draconomicon and the 3e Draconomicon? The 2e book was pretty short, but almost entirely fluff and this dragon lover quite enjoyed it. The 3e version was big and full of crunch, but it also had a lot of good fluff (maybe even as much as 2e).Fizban's Treasury of Dragons was somewhat disappointing for me. A lot of its fluff was just random tables. I'm actually a big fan of random tables, I'm just not a fan of how 5e has started to use them. I'm also not a fan of most of the statblock and design changes for monsters, so much of its crunch is going to need reworked for me (unlike the 2e and 3e stuff).If this book is more like the old Draconomicons then I might actually be interested in it.</blockquote>