Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dwimmerlied" data-source="post: 6138614" data-attributes="member: 6706967">I agree that an adventuring wizard would and should take absolutely every precaution, because they likely have an idea of what toll their travels can take on their spellbook, and how much crap they'd be in if they lost them. Still, low level characters often don't have the resources they need to adequately protect their books, I think. Also, considering RAW, items are supposed to make save checks if their possessor fails a save (if the attack/circumstance is likely to result in damage to the item).I actually haven't ever implemented this, and was just wondering how it plays out when I checked, and was quite surprised! I agree with [MENTION=22424]delericho[/MENTION] in as much as I understand what they said; the rules regarding the situation seem internally consistent, and the high price is (IMO) probably fitting. But on top of the high price, the rules are very fiddly, and the implications for your campaign are problematic to say the least.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dwimmerlied, post: 6138614, member: 6706967"] I agree that an adventuring wizard would and should take absolutely every precaution, because they likely have an idea of what toll their travels can take on their spellbook, and how much crap they'd be in if they lost them. Still, low level characters often don't have the resources they need to adequately protect their books, I think. Also, considering RAW, items are supposed to make save checks if their possessor fails a save (if the attack/circumstance is likely to result in damage to the item). I actually haven't ever implemented this, and was just wondering how it plays out when I checked, and was quite surprised! I agree with [MENTION=22424]delericho[/MENTION] in as much as I understand what they said; the rules regarding the situation seem internally consistent, and the high price is (IMO) probably fitting. But on top of the high price, the rules are very fiddly, and the implications for your campaign are problematic to say the least. [/QUOTE]

Verification