Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Problem of DDI...Solved! (Well, not really)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arlough" data-source="post: 5535438" data-attributes="member: 79335"><p>They could have offered subscriptions in year and half year formats only.</p><p>Of course, this doesn't solve the problem of people only getting a subscription long enough to update errata. I think the real problem here is they didn't have something that was valuable to those customers (the ones who no longer subscribe), or at least valuable enough to justify the amount WotC was charging.</p><p></p><p>The reason I stopped subscribing (and probably why many didn't feel the need to maintain subscriptions) is because I really didn't want to buy corrections. If I am buying something, make it content.</p><p></p><p>EnWorld gives me content, and I pay a monthly tribute to EnWorld in thanks for that. I get access to multiple adventure paths from beginning to end. I also get periodic articles and updates, as well as access to interesting and well thought out ideas. And, if there is an issue, I can rest assured that EnWorld will take into consideration the input of the users and make changes based on what the users think would be best for the games we play.</p><p></p><p>If DDi offered even just that, I would be happy paying $5 a month for the service. If they really wanted to get money from me, they would offer things that facilitate me, as a DM, making sure their game was played.</p><p>If, say, we could get a group account for 1 DM and 5 players for a monthly fee of $20 to $25, then not only would my group pay that, but I as a DM would probably be willing to pay even if the group wouldn't.</p><p></p><p>But as it is, I just didn't feel like it was worth it. DDi didn't provide me, as a DM, any tools that really helped me make the game happen. No digital dash where I could look at all the characters next to each other, digital DM screen where I could reference data easily, and no way for me to create custom elements for my game. I also don't feel like there has really been any value add to the rules since PHB3 came out (and even that was of questionable value), and I don't treasure the flood of feats, powers, and accompanying errata that have lead to the current power <s>creep</s> sprint.</p><p></p><p>And since I have frozen the rules at pre-essentials, and the OCB doesn't allow for house rules, then my players certainly have not found it worth paying for either.</p><p></p><p>It's not that I am unwilling to pay. It is that the amount I pay must be proportional to the value I feel I am getting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arlough, post: 5535438, member: 79335"] They could have offered subscriptions in year and half year formats only. Of course, this doesn't solve the problem of people only getting a subscription long enough to update errata. I think the real problem here is they didn't have something that was valuable to those customers (the ones who no longer subscribe), or at least valuable enough to justify the amount WotC was charging. The reason I stopped subscribing (and probably why many didn't feel the need to maintain subscriptions) is because I really didn't want to buy corrections. If I am buying something, make it content. EnWorld gives me content, and I pay a monthly tribute to EnWorld in thanks for that. I get access to multiple adventure paths from beginning to end. I also get periodic articles and updates, as well as access to interesting and well thought out ideas. And, if there is an issue, I can rest assured that EnWorld will take into consideration the input of the users and make changes based on what the users think would be best for the games we play. If DDi offered even just that, I would be happy paying $5 a month for the service. If they really wanted to get money from me, they would offer things that facilitate me, as a DM, making sure their game was played. If, say, we could get a group account for 1 DM and 5 players for a monthly fee of $20 to $25, then not only would my group pay that, but I as a DM would probably be willing to pay even if the group wouldn't. But as it is, I just didn't feel like it was worth it. DDi didn't provide me, as a DM, any tools that really helped me make the game happen. No digital dash where I could look at all the characters next to each other, digital DM screen where I could reference data easily, and no way for me to create custom elements for my game. I also don't feel like there has really been any value add to the rules since PHB3 came out (and even that was of questionable value), and I don't treasure the flood of feats, powers, and accompanying errata that have lead to the current power [s]creep[/s] sprint. And since I have frozen the rules at pre-essentials, and the OCB doesn't allow for house rules, then my players certainly have not found it worth paying for either. It's not that I am unwilling to pay. It is that the amount I pay must be proportional to the value I feel I am getting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Problem of DDI...Solved! (Well, not really)
Top