Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Problem of DDI...Solved! (Well, not really)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Balesir" data-source="post: 5536094" data-attributes="member: 27160"><p>Of course they are in business to make a profit - that was originally <em><strong>my</strong></em> point. But when production capacity is in practical terms unlimited and production cost is close to zero, that does equate to getting maximum <strong>paid for</strong> (at some level) units in use.</p><p> </p><p>You are getting all confused in your examples, here. "Charging (only) the cost of lumber and labour" is the equivalent of selling for the marginal cost - which is zero in the case of digital downloads. I.e. it is the equivalent of saying WotC should give away the software for free. I'm not suggesting that; for a business it would be a crazy thing to do. Selling the CB (or any other software) for any price at all is selling above marginal cost - which is something any business has to do to survive. If production capacity is limited (and I would be very keen to hear of any boatyard or hot tub factory where it is not), there is a minimum premium above the marginal cost that you have to sell at, even assuming demand will sell you out. If production capacity is massively larger than demand (at little or no capital cost), as is the case with downloadable software, then the only factor that sets the minimum premium is the demand. I imagine this was just the issue WotC had (although I have no way to know, for sure). If so, they had to do something, certainly. But as I said above, I think there were far better options available than what they actually did, which was to change from a sales-and-service agreement to a rental agreement (for the same price!).</p><p> </p><p>That's like saying every person who doesn't buy a boat costs the boatyard profit when they pay a fare to use the ferry. If the revenue for the OCB wasn't enough, the answer was simple - put the price up. That price hike didn't need to come via deciding the boats are now only available for rent, and they reserve the right to reclaim the boat if either you stop paying or they just no longer feel like taking your money for it. Oh, and no other boatyard has any right to make boats to actually sell to you, because this boatyard has exclusive rights to all boats.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Balesir, post: 5536094, member: 27160"] Of course they are in business to make a profit - that was originally [I][B]my[/B][/I] point. But when production capacity is in practical terms unlimited and production cost is close to zero, that does equate to getting maximum [B]paid for[/B] (at some level) units in use. You are getting all confused in your examples, here. "Charging (only) the cost of lumber and labour" is the equivalent of selling for the marginal cost - which is zero in the case of digital downloads. I.e. it is the equivalent of saying WotC should give away the software for free. I'm not suggesting that; for a business it would be a crazy thing to do. Selling the CB (or any other software) for any price at all is selling above marginal cost - which is something any business has to do to survive. If production capacity is limited (and I would be very keen to hear of any boatyard or hot tub factory where it is not), there is a minimum premium above the marginal cost that you have to sell at, even assuming demand will sell you out. If production capacity is massively larger than demand (at little or no capital cost), as is the case with downloadable software, then the only factor that sets the minimum premium is the demand. I imagine this was just the issue WotC had (although I have no way to know, for sure). If so, they had to do something, certainly. But as I said above, I think there were far better options available than what they actually did, which was to change from a sales-and-service agreement to a rental agreement (for the same price!). That's like saying every person who doesn't buy a boat costs the boatyard profit when they pay a fare to use the ferry. If the revenue for the OCB wasn't enough, the answer was simple - put the price up. That price hike didn't need to come via deciding the boats are now only available for rent, and they reserve the right to reclaim the boat if either you stop paying or they just no longer feel like taking your money for it. Oh, and no other boatyard has any right to make boats to actually sell to you, because this boatyard has exclusive rights to all boats. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Problem of DDI...Solved! (Well, not really)
Top