Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Zardnaar" data-source="post: 7364297" data-attributes="member: 6716779">I would have to be something like a Mastermind Rogue that gives up its damage dealing features in order to enable someone else. Perhaps swap out its ability to use the help action as a bonus action and replace it with attack granting. If you give up one of the best attacks singular attacks in the game (sneak attack) to enable someone else to sneak attack that is fine. You would not get anything in terms of healing or other Warlord type things.&nbsp;Several feats also come to mind so you could layer WL abilities onto various classes..&nbsp;Other classes gave up tings that defined them such as weapon specialisation (1E-3E), replaced with other abilities that function differently (fighting styles, action surge etc, no DC 30+ spell DCs or lots of buffing).&nbsp;YOu can go bitch and moan at Mearls if you like but he will ignore you more than I will, at least I would give you the warlord as an independent class.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Zardnaar, post: 7364297, member: 6716779"] I would have to be something like a Mastermind Rogue that gives up its damage dealing features in order to enable someone else. Perhaps swap out its ability to use the help action as a bonus action and replace it with attack granting. If you give up one of the best attacks singular attacks in the game (sneak attack) to enable someone else to sneak attack that is fine. You would not get anything in terms of healing or other Warlord type things. Several feats also come to mind so you could layer WL abilities onto various classes.. Other classes gave up tings that defined them such as weapon specialisation (1E-3E), replaced with other abilities that function differently (fighting styles, action surge etc, no DC 30+ spell DCs or lots of buffing). YOu can go bitch and moan at Mearls if you like but he will ignore you more than I will, at least I would give you the warlord as an independent class. [/QUOTE]

Verification