Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The problem with Cohorts !!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 887624" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>Leadership is probably the toughest Feat to handle well, which is why it's in the DMG instead of the PHB.</p><p></p><p>Short answer: it looks like your friend never read the Cohort section on p. 147-148 of the DMG. While the last paragraph allows for cohorts to be treated as full characters, this isn't the default and it clearly warns against the problems this'll cause.</p><p></p><p>Long answer:</p><p><em>Originally posted by Hackenslash </em></p><p><strong> I feel that to allow a Cohort to be the same level... basically places an equally powerfull character in the control of a PC </strong></p><p></p><p>Well, first of all, by the book the cohort has to be LOWER in level, the Feat text is "he can't recruit a cohort of his level or higher", so if he's, say, level 15, his cohort can be at most level 14. And that'd require a Leadership score of 20, so he'd need a high CHA (20 or higher). Most players who use CHA as a dump stat won't get one that high. The typical player would end up with a cohort 3-4 levels below them.</p><p></p><p><strong>the player in question is a Cleric/ Prestige Scion sub class form the Ultimate Prestige Classes Book, and has a Minotaur Cohort, wait for it...Cleric/Holy Liberator...of the same total levels as his own class.</strong></p><p></p><p>By "total levels", you're including the ECL of the Minotaur, right? Because Minotaurs are ECL +8 (according to the DMG, anyway, other results may vary), so if he's a level 15 Cleric, his Minotaur cohort couldn't have more than 6 total class levels. That'd probably keep him from entering a PrC easily.</p><p></p><p>That's why there's that "Special Cohort" table. By default, your cohort is just an ordinary ECL+0 race. This isn't a sneaky way to get around the ECL rules.</p><p></p><p><strong>Now that in itself may not seem to be an issue in a high level campaign but it does provoke questions as to whether the PC is just taking advantage of the rules so that he can be in both sets of Dialogues/Discussions and take part in multi action scenarios, and always have a say in every scenario to the annoyance of other players with only one class who sometimes don't get a word in edgeways. </strong></p><p></p><p>That sort of dynamic is up to the DM to handle, but remember that the cohort is basically a follower, NOT an equal member of the party. He's there to protect and assist the PC.</p><p></p><p>Read the Cohort description on page 147 in the DMG. It definitely doesn't support the sort of system you're talking about.</p><p></p><p>By the book (the p. 147 thing), the Cohort is simply an NPC that follows the player around and helps him. The DM controls him in most character-based discussions (with suggestions from the player), although most DMs I've seen let the player decide his combat actions. He only gets a half-share of the XP and loot.</p><p></p><p>Cohorts make great characters for visiting players to play, and when you retire your main character you have a ready-made character to jump to. They're not supposed to be a replacement for the original character.</p><p></p><p><strong>However I am digressing, the main point of this thread is to see what you all think of the Rules for Cohorts in the DnD Game and whether you think that they are Fair and more importantly, should they be as powerfull as the PC that controls them. </strong></p><p></p><p>They're okay. Not great, just okay. And no, they shouldn't be as powerful as the PC that controls them, which is why the rules as written don't <strong>allow</strong> them to be equal level.</p><p></p><p><strong>nor would I be rude enough, to try and change my friends campaign rules, as he seems to be ok with high level cohorts running around getting their own missions and quests and having equal say in party decisions. Cheers and hope to hear from you all soon. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </strong></p><p></p><p>If he's running a campaign where cohorts are the equals in every way of the characters who selected them, then he's really using a house rule and there's no reason not to take the Feat. Effectively, everyone will be playing 2 characters. Now, that can be a lot of fun, too (especially in small parties of 2-4 players), but it's only "balanced" if all of the players are doing it.</p><p></p><p>*********</p><p></p><p>Now, IMC we totally redesigned the Feat to follow a point-based system, so it's been a little while since I used the rules as written.</p><p></p><p>The character I currently play (a Psychic Warrior) was the cohort of my previous character (a Psion) under the old Leadership feat, so keeping that Feat available can be a very good thing IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 887624, member: 3051"] Leadership is probably the toughest Feat to handle well, which is why it's in the DMG instead of the PHB. Short answer: it looks like your friend never read the Cohort section on p. 147-148 of the DMG. While the last paragraph allows for cohorts to be treated as full characters, this isn't the default and it clearly warns against the problems this'll cause. Long answer: [i]Originally posted by Hackenslash [/i] [B] I feel that to allow a Cohort to be the same level... basically places an equally powerfull character in the control of a PC [/B] Well, first of all, by the book the cohort has to be LOWER in level, the Feat text is "he can't recruit a cohort of his level or higher", so if he's, say, level 15, his cohort can be at most level 14. And that'd require a Leadership score of 20, so he'd need a high CHA (20 or higher). Most players who use CHA as a dump stat won't get one that high. The typical player would end up with a cohort 3-4 levels below them. [B]the player in question is a Cleric/ Prestige Scion sub class form the Ultimate Prestige Classes Book, and has a Minotaur Cohort, wait for it...Cleric/Holy Liberator...of the same total levels as his own class.[/B] By "total levels", you're including the ECL of the Minotaur, right? Because Minotaurs are ECL +8 (according to the DMG, anyway, other results may vary), so if he's a level 15 Cleric, his Minotaur cohort couldn't have more than 6 total class levels. That'd probably keep him from entering a PrC easily. That's why there's that "Special Cohort" table. By default, your cohort is just an ordinary ECL+0 race. This isn't a sneaky way to get around the ECL rules. [B]Now that in itself may not seem to be an issue in a high level campaign but it does provoke questions as to whether the PC is just taking advantage of the rules so that he can be in both sets of Dialogues/Discussions and take part in multi action scenarios, and always have a say in every scenario to the annoyance of other players with only one class who sometimes don't get a word in edgeways. [/B] That sort of dynamic is up to the DM to handle, but remember that the cohort is basically a follower, NOT an equal member of the party. He's there to protect and assist the PC. Read the Cohort description on page 147 in the DMG. It definitely doesn't support the sort of system you're talking about. By the book (the p. 147 thing), the Cohort is simply an NPC that follows the player around and helps him. The DM controls him in most character-based discussions (with suggestions from the player), although most DMs I've seen let the player decide his combat actions. He only gets a half-share of the XP and loot. Cohorts make great characters for visiting players to play, and when you retire your main character you have a ready-made character to jump to. They're not supposed to be a replacement for the original character. [B]However I am digressing, the main point of this thread is to see what you all think of the Rules for Cohorts in the DnD Game and whether you think that they are Fair and more importantly, should they be as powerfull as the PC that controls them. [/B] They're okay. Not great, just okay. And no, they shouldn't be as powerful as the PC that controls them, which is why the rules as written don't [b]allow[/b] them to be equal level. [B]nor would I be rude enough, to try and change my friends campaign rules, as he seems to be ok with high level cohorts running around getting their own missions and quests and having equal say in party decisions. Cheers and hope to hear from you all soon. :) [/B] If he's running a campaign where cohorts are the equals in every way of the characters who selected them, then he's really using a house rule and there's no reason not to take the Feat. Effectively, everyone will be playing 2 characters. Now, that can be a lot of fun, too (especially in small parties of 2-4 players), but it's only "balanced" if all of the players are doing it. ********* Now, IMC we totally redesigned the Feat to follow a point-based system, so it's been a little while since I used the rules as written. The character I currently play (a Psychic Warrior) was the cohort of my previous character (a Psion) under the old Leadership feat, so keeping that Feat available can be a very good thing IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The problem with Cohorts !!
Top