Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 3372859" data-attributes="member: 22779">Ah, yes, the old quantity vs quality argument.&nbsp; Never really goes out of style does it?&nbsp; It doesn't really matter if you refer to them as flaws, pros or small billy goats.&nbsp; The point is, the vast majority of gamers prefer 3e.&nbsp; You can say its all because of marketing and that's fair I suppose.&nbsp; I say its because the vast majority of gamers out there prefer a better quality product.&nbsp; I say its because gamers prefer games that don't require the players to rework the rules.&nbsp; Who's right?&nbsp; Dunno.&nbsp; But, if you refer to a game's flaws, at least pick out genuine ones.&nbsp; Heck 3e has more than enough of them.&nbsp; Class system, Vancian magic and the d20 are hardly sole features of 3rd edition.&nbsp; If those were truly flaws, dontcha think that the gaming public might have caught on to a better system after thirty years or so?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 3372859, member: 22779"] Ah, yes, the old quantity vs quality argument. Never really goes out of style does it? It doesn't really matter if you refer to them as flaws, pros or small billy goats. The point is, the vast majority of gamers prefer 3e. You can say its all because of marketing and that's fair I suppose. I say its because the vast majority of gamers out there prefer a better quality product. I say its because gamers prefer games that don't require the players to rework the rules. Who's right? Dunno. But, if you refer to a game's flaws, at least pick out genuine ones. Heck 3e has more than enough of them. Class system, Vancian magic and the d20 are hardly sole features of 3rd edition. If those were truly flaws, dontcha think that the gaming public might have caught on to a better system after thirty years or so? [/QUOTE]

Verification