Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Problem with Healing Powercreep
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Gasik" data-source="post: 9510849" data-attributes="member: 6877472"><p>There's lots of things you can do in the current model of D&D that doesn't require a die roll. You can jump a set amount based on your Strength, with an optional roll if the DM wishes to allow you to jump more.</p><p></p><p>You can climb or swim automatically, unless the DM rules there are few handholds or the water is especially rough. In most other systems, you'd have to roll to perform any of these feats.</p><p></p><p>Casting a spell doesn't require a roll in most cases (but sometimes it does), but neither does parrying via the Defensive Duelist Feat.</p><p></p><p>I could go on, but the absence or presence of a die roll doesn't mean something it trivially simple- it just means that the designers of the system felt that some things should be allowed to happen, to keep the game running smoothly.</p><p></p><p>After all, we've seen what happens when WotC decides to get in the weeds of how complicated a task could be- just look at 3.5's systems for grappling and other combat maneuvers, for example.</p><p></p><p>Streamlining the process might not be to some people's taste, but that's the choice that was made. You don't have to like it, and nobody is forcing you to.</p><p></p><p>You can accept, adapt, or pass on the current iteration of the game's rules, just as with every other iteration. If you believe D&D peaked in 1974, for example, nothing someone who disagrees with you is going to make you suddenly like or accept 5e. Or 4e. Or 3e. Or 2e.</p><p></p><p>And the same holds true for people who like other versions.</p><p></p><p>So at this point, is everyone just arguing to argue? This is one of those debates that has no real end, it just goes dormant and resurfaces at another time. Like is the Martial/Caster divide real, was there really a Hickman Revolution, Arneson vs. Gygax, what the Bard, Ranger (or any class for that matter) should be like, to multiclass or not, whether Monks are terrible or Katanas are the bestest weapon everer, Dogs vs. Cats, Tomayto or Tomahto, etc. etc..</p><p></p><p>It all comes down to "this is what I prefer, and I think it's better than whatever other people like" lol. And you know what? It's ok to have preferences!</p><p></p><p>And it's ok to gripe about them, but generating post after post of "you're wrong!" and "nuh uh!" isn't really making any headway, is it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Gasik, post: 9510849, member: 6877472"] There's lots of things you can do in the current model of D&D that doesn't require a die roll. You can jump a set amount based on your Strength, with an optional roll if the DM wishes to allow you to jump more. You can climb or swim automatically, unless the DM rules there are few handholds or the water is especially rough. In most other systems, you'd have to roll to perform any of these feats. Casting a spell doesn't require a roll in most cases (but sometimes it does), but neither does parrying via the Defensive Duelist Feat. I could go on, but the absence or presence of a die roll doesn't mean something it trivially simple- it just means that the designers of the system felt that some things should be allowed to happen, to keep the game running smoothly. After all, we've seen what happens when WotC decides to get in the weeds of how complicated a task could be- just look at 3.5's systems for grappling and other combat maneuvers, for example. Streamlining the process might not be to some people's taste, but that's the choice that was made. You don't have to like it, and nobody is forcing you to. You can accept, adapt, or pass on the current iteration of the game's rules, just as with every other iteration. If you believe D&D peaked in 1974, for example, nothing someone who disagrees with you is going to make you suddenly like or accept 5e. Or 4e. Or 3e. Or 2e. And the same holds true for people who like other versions. So at this point, is everyone just arguing to argue? This is one of those debates that has no real end, it just goes dormant and resurfaces at another time. Like is the Martial/Caster divide real, was there really a Hickman Revolution, Arneson vs. Gygax, what the Bard, Ranger (or any class for that matter) should be like, to multiclass or not, whether Monks are terrible or Katanas are the bestest weapon everer, Dogs vs. Cats, Tomayto or Tomahto, etc. etc.. It all comes down to "this is what I prefer, and I think it's better than whatever other people like" lol. And you know what? It's ok to have preferences! And it's ok to gripe about them, but generating post after post of "you're wrong!" and "nuh uh!" isn't really making any headway, is it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Problem with Healing Powercreep
Top