Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Problem with Wizard Schools (long)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DonAdam" data-source="post: 147831" data-attributes="member: 2446"><p>There is a fundamental flaw in the division of the wizard schools that has been around since 2nd edition.</p><p></p><p>Page 54 of the PHB says that a school has "a common theme." I think we can all see that this breaks down in the name of balance pretty quickly.</p><p>Mage armor, a clear example of energy usage, is a conjuration spell. </p><p>Enchantment spells are to include mind-influencing effects or "spell that imbue the recipient with some property," when in fact every spell like that is a transmutation spell.</p><p></p><p>The school names themselves seem to betray the idea of an artificial distinction.</p><p>Abjuration, Enchantment, Divination, Transmutation, and Illusion seem to be concerned mainly with the effect of the spell, while conjuration, necromancy, and evocation seem to indicate the method by which the spell is cast. What is needed is a uniform distinction.</p><p></p><p>The 3e creators have provided the tool necessary to do this: descriptors. Descriptors are implicitly focused on the effect of the spell, realizing that since its magic, it doesn't need a particular explanation or ANY EXPLANATION AT ALL.</p><p></p><p>Is burning hands an evocation spell because you're making energy? Is is a conjuration spell because you're summoning the energy from the elemental plane of fire? Is it a transmutation spell because you have changed the air into fire?</p><p></p><p>IT DOESN'T MATTER. What matters is the effect.</p><p></p><p>The descriptors in Chapter 10 are far superior tools.</p><p></p><p>Here's my preliminary thoughts on what the divisions should be:</p><p>1) Calling</p><p>2) Creation</p><p>3) Summoning</p><p>4) Charm</p><p>5) Compulsion</p><p>6) Figment</p><p>7) Glamer</p><p>8) Pattern</p><p>9) Phantasm</p><p>10) Shadow</p><p>11) Force (mage armor, magic missile, etc)</p><p>12) Elemental (this could break down into subgroups)</p><p>13) Necromantic (this is narrow enough to stay as is, and I would group healing under it)</p><p></p><p>The problem children are Abjuration, Divination, and Transmutation.</p><p></p><p>The only one I've really thought about is Transmutation, and I would divide that into</p><p>1) Imbuing- giving something a property it didn't have before</p><p>2) Transmutation- actually changing a quality of something</p><p></p><p>I haven't had a chance to think about abjuration and divination yet.</p><p></p><p>This line of thought holds some promise I believe, though it would take a great deal of work to iron out the divisions and make them balanced for the sake of specialization.</p><p></p><p>Does anyone have any thoughts on anything I've done wrong or left out?</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, would anybody be interested in a more expansive write-up of this, done formally and with the wizard specialists redone?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DonAdam, post: 147831, member: 2446"] There is a fundamental flaw in the division of the wizard schools that has been around since 2nd edition. Page 54 of the PHB says that a school has "a common theme." I think we can all see that this breaks down in the name of balance pretty quickly. Mage armor, a clear example of energy usage, is a conjuration spell. Enchantment spells are to include mind-influencing effects or "spell that imbue the recipient with some property," when in fact every spell like that is a transmutation spell. The school names themselves seem to betray the idea of an artificial distinction. Abjuration, Enchantment, Divination, Transmutation, and Illusion seem to be concerned mainly with the effect of the spell, while conjuration, necromancy, and evocation seem to indicate the method by which the spell is cast. What is needed is a uniform distinction. The 3e creators have provided the tool necessary to do this: descriptors. Descriptors are implicitly focused on the effect of the spell, realizing that since its magic, it doesn't need a particular explanation or ANY EXPLANATION AT ALL. Is burning hands an evocation spell because you're making energy? Is is a conjuration spell because you're summoning the energy from the elemental plane of fire? Is it a transmutation spell because you have changed the air into fire? IT DOESN'T MATTER. What matters is the effect. The descriptors in Chapter 10 are far superior tools. Here's my preliminary thoughts on what the divisions should be: 1) Calling 2) Creation 3) Summoning 4) Charm 5) Compulsion 6) Figment 7) Glamer 8) Pattern 9) Phantasm 10) Shadow 11) Force (mage armor, magic missile, etc) 12) Elemental (this could break down into subgroups) 13) Necromantic (this is narrow enough to stay as is, and I would group healing under it) The problem children are Abjuration, Divination, and Transmutation. The only one I've really thought about is Transmutation, and I would divide that into 1) Imbuing- giving something a property it didn't have before 2) Transmutation- actually changing a quality of something I haven't had a chance to think about abjuration and divination yet. This line of thought holds some promise I believe, though it would take a great deal of work to iron out the divisions and make them balanced for the sake of specialization. Does anyone have any thoughts on anything I've done wrong or left out? Furthermore, would anybody be interested in a more expansive write-up of this, done formally and with the wizard specialists redone? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Problem with Wizard Schools (long)
Top