Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8493098" data-attributes="member: 12731">I guess I don't have the definite answer for that.If I were to take a guess, my best effort would be that in a universe where dragons exist and people can shoot fireballs from their fingertips it wouldn't be unreasonable to also include the idea that sheer magnetism and physical attraction works as a personal protective shield, just as well as physical armor but less heavy and chafing?I mean look - we both know the reason is that people like to look at pretty girls. Still, trying to subject warrior women to the harsh laws of physics while the magic users can ignore them is dodgy logic, at best.So it boils down to a simple fact: if you like your women to wear sensible armor, go ahead and do just that. Me, I go with the option that suits the campaign. For a gritty game of Warhammer, there absolutely are actual reasons why nobody wears boob windows or combat thongs. But for swords & planets, I would absolutely allow Dejah Thoris to reach her maximum Armor Class nekkid. What I don't try to do, however, is argue one approach is "more real" or "better" than the other.After all, the name of the genre is "fantasy" <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>