Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 9725943" data-attributes="member: 7635">Yeah. Sorry. Not here for it. I'm sick and tired of lore purists screaming bloody murder if you dare change anything.I like Keith Baker's take. He never says what is the canon or correct answer. He says "In my Eberron" to imply his is not the only version of the setting that matters. His Eberron is not 100% aligned with WotCs, and it certainly doesn't align with mine which has all manner continuity edits and personal spins. Yet his, and mine, and WotCs are all valid interpretations. Keith's opinions aren't any more important or valid than mine. He's more knowledgeable and has a wider audience, but that alone doesn't make his take right any mine wrong.But I can see why some people can't understand that egalitarian view of D&D. There has to be a correct way to play. There has to be a One True canon, a version that is more pure, more correct, more authoritative. A version they can hold up as Word of God that they're right and I'm stupid.I'm done with that. Lore is a suggestion. Canon a false prophet. Make each setting your own. There is no wrong way to play as long as everyone is having fun.</blockquote>