Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
The Purpose of the + in Thread Titles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Redwizard007" data-source="post: 8944256" data-attributes="member: 7024098"><p>100% chance that i regret posting this, but what the hell.</p><p></p><p>I have seen a number of "+" posts over the years, there is at least one getting some attention right now, and they largely seem to end up with bright red Mod-scrawl all over them, name calling, the questioning of commenters values, ethics, and parentage, and a general lack of civility. It has gotten to the point that when I see a "+" post, I tend to not even read it, for fear of running face first into a pointless argument about why Star Wars is clearly superior to Startrek, how Hollowworld could be updated to avoid cultural taboos while caricaturizing even more real world cultures, or water isn't wet (+++). </p><p></p><p>So, what is the point of a +++ conversation? On its face, they are saying, "if you agree with my base premise, please contribute, and otherwise move on," and that seems fine. We don't have to engage. We all have the option to let conspiracy buffs question the moon landing, or the existence of a deep-state conspiracy that is pulling the strings at WotC to add anthromorphic caterpillars to 6e in place of our beloved gnomes, or even the efficacy of modern medicine, BUT there are some who feel that allowing such (probably) misguided opinions a forum without challenging some of their core concepts is in its self a failure. Perhaps a failure of education, or morals, or critical thinking, but a failure that we can not make in good conscience. So we engage. We discuss. We dig into the why, and the what, and the how, and before long we get, "hey, bud. This is a +++ thread, so if you don't agree that anthropomorphic caterpillars are better than gnomes then you shouldn't be commenting," and that is infuriating. </p><p></p><p>On every forum that I have ever seen, the number 1 rule usually boils down to "don't be a dick." Now, I haven't always followed that rule as closely as I should have, and I regret that, but I have never once tried to hide an unpopular opinion behind a +++ post, although I considered doing it here. Message boards from ENWorld to Reddit are a place where I come to get <em>differing</em> perspectives. If I wanted an echo chamber I would be on Facebook. </p><p></p><p>I wanted to posit a question, or a poll, but I guess a rambling rant was more cathartic. So, how do you feel about + threads?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Redwizard007, post: 8944256, member: 7024098"] 100% chance that i regret posting this, but what the hell. I have seen a number of "+" posts over the years, there is at least one getting some attention right now, and they largely seem to end up with bright red Mod-scrawl all over them, name calling, the questioning of commenters values, ethics, and parentage, and a general lack of civility. It has gotten to the point that when I see a "+" post, I tend to not even read it, for fear of running face first into a pointless argument about why Star Wars is clearly superior to Startrek, how Hollowworld could be updated to avoid cultural taboos while caricaturizing even more real world cultures, or water isn't wet (+++). So, what is the point of a +++ conversation? On its face, they are saying, "if you agree with my base premise, please contribute, and otherwise move on," and that seems fine. We don't have to engage. We all have the option to let conspiracy buffs question the moon landing, or the existence of a deep-state conspiracy that is pulling the strings at WotC to add anthromorphic caterpillars to 6e in place of our beloved gnomes, or even the efficacy of modern medicine, BUT there are some who feel that allowing such (probably) misguided opinions a forum without challenging some of their core concepts is in its self a failure. Perhaps a failure of education, or morals, or critical thinking, but a failure that we can not make in good conscience. So we engage. We discuss. We dig into the why, and the what, and the how, and before long we get, "hey, bud. This is a +++ thread, so if you don't agree that anthropomorphic caterpillars are better than gnomes then you shouldn't be commenting," and that is infuriating. On every forum that I have ever seen, the number 1 rule usually boils down to "don't be a dick." Now, I haven't always followed that rule as closely as I should have, and I regret that, but I have never once tried to hide an unpopular opinion behind a +++ post, although I considered doing it here. Message boards from ENWorld to Reddit are a place where I come to get [I]differing[/I] perspectives. If I wanted an echo chamber I would be on Facebook. I wanted to posit a question, or a poll, but I guess a rambling rant was more cathartic. So, how do you feel about + threads? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
The Purpose of the + in Thread Titles
Top